Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hegemonic media and inequality in Brazil

Bibliographic Data

ID21215613
AuthorsRaquel Paiva (0000-0001-8786-751X, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume3
Issue2
Pages100-107
Publication date2018-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Media and China (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2059-4364 • E-ISSN: 2059-4372
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2059436418786267
OpenAlexW2884957825
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

In Brazil, the traditional media crisis coincides with the historical moment of weakening political liberalism and the transit of the rational idea of the people in favor of a still obscure mass of population, redefined and fixed by the expanded market. There is a general perception that the forms of representation or framing of the social–political field, dating to the 18th and 19th centuries, cease to be operative in understanding and evaluating socially significant events. In the old place of argumentative rhetoric, the database files come in. The obliteration of the receptive pole in favor of the emission opens the way for the autonomization of the algorithm, that is, for the artificial intelligence to control the entire interlocutory process. On the other hand, the crisis of traditional forms does not imply the disappearance of journalism, which remains virtually a space, to be occupied in the recreation of new forms of mediation politically significant for civil society, even taking into account that the great constitutive principles Of modernity (social contract, democracy, citizenship, state, nation, individual identity) are no longer in tune with the social synthesis operated by the new socioeconomic order. Thus, journalism as a modern phenomenon can be redefined by the market and technology. And professional journalists is just one of several categories of actors mobilized to determine the facts and turn them into media event. In this context, a new, more segmented fact-finding power emerges, as well as a new kind of relationship between the public and the knowledge of reality. The so-called “social” networks are the most palpable example of this new state of affairs, fueling speculation about the modeling of this new type of journalism

Democracy · Hegemony · Journalism · Media studies · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Rhetoric · Sociology · Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies · Law · Media and Communication Studies

  • Global China and everyday mediation in the Global South

    Open Access•Johanna Von Pezold•Global Media and China•2023

  • Racism, Death, and Protests in Brazil

    Open Access•Mathias-Felipe De-Lima-Santos, Wilson Ceron•Online Media and Global…•2022

  • Data Journalism in favela

    Open Access•Mathias-Felipe De-Lima-Santos, Lucia Mesquita•Journalism Practice•2021

  • Professional, social and regulatory characteristics of journalism in online and traditional media in Brazil

    Raquel Paiva, Márcio Guerra et al.•African Journalism Studies•2015

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae