Between Rebellion and Statesmanship
Attempting a Biography of Ivanko, 1196/1200 (?)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21219706 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francesco Dall’Aglio (0000-0003-3318-7011, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 91-106 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studia Ceranea Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2084-140X • E-ISSN: 2449-8378 |
| Publisher | Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18778/2084-140x.11.05 |
| OpenAlex | W4226364036 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 16 |
The paper analyses the actions of Ivanko, a Bulgarian nobleman, possibly a member of the ruling family of the Asenides, who in 1196 killed the ruling tsar, Asen, and escaped to Constantinople once his plan to take control of the country failed. Owing to the benevolence of Alexios III Angelos, he joined the Byzantine military and very quickly rose through its ranks until he became the military commander of the region of Philippopolis. In 1198 or 1999 he defected and created an independent dominion on the slopes of the Stara Planina massif, precariously balanced between Bulgaria and the empire, exploiting to his own advantage the constant state of warfare between the two polities. His adventure was short-lived: in 1200 he was captured through deception by the Byzantines, taken prisoner, and presumably executed. While his political career was very short, his importance for the history of medieval Bulgaria is not to be underestimated. It is a testimony of the fluidity of the political situation at the Bulgaro-Byzantine border, whose instability often allowed ambitious and cunning local commanders to carve up autonomous dominions, and of the difficulties experienced by the central power in keeping control of the peripheral areas of the state. It is also proof of the constantly shifting ethnic and cultural allegiances of the citizens of those polities, entangled between different and often conflicting identities, usually regarded as irreconcilable but that were actually the object of a continuous negotiation and adjusting. Ivanko is an interesting case study in regard to all of those factors, especially when considered within the larger phenomenon of provincial separatism in the imperial (and Bulgarian) lands between the end of the 12th and the beginning of the 13th century
Adventure · Ancient history · Art history · Bulgarian · Byzantine architecture · Dominion · Empire · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · Byzantine Studies and History · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Law · Philosophy
The Middle Byzantine Historians
The Byzantine Hellene
Distortion, divine providence and genre in Nicetas Choniates's account of the collapse of Byzantium 1180–1204
Dynasticity in the Second Bulgarian Tsardom and its Manifestations in Medieval History Writing
Cumans and Tatars
Historical Master Narratives and the Master Narrative of the Bulgarian Middle Ages
Niketas Choniates
| Highly cited | No |
|---|