Middle East Studies Under Occupation
The Case of Washington, D.C
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21222254 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Corey Sherman (University of California Hastings College of the Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 4-27 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Middle East Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2151-3481 • E-ISSN: 2329-3225 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/rms.2021.32 |
| OpenAlex | W4220779277 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
A key component of Middle East Studies methodology is to identify and deconstruct the relationship between knowledge about the region and the power structures that give knowledge meaning. Typically, that methodology is applied to Middle East Studies at the post-secondary level. This paper applies that methodology to public schools in Washington, D.C. Through structural analysis, I will tease out the “epistemological commitments” (Abu El Haj 2001) of what the government of Washington, D.C. calls “social studies learning standards” -- short sentences which “detail the knowledge students are expected to acquire at a particular grade level.” Based on my experience teaching the Middle East in a Washington, D.C. public high school, I also raise questions about the relationship between the content standards and teachers’ work conditions, and whether such conditions support or inhibit the development of a praxis (Freire 2016) which could deconstruct US colonialism inside American public schools. One goal of this paper is to bring Middle East Studies into conversation with American Studies, broadly defined, and in particular ethnographic studies of DC that consider the colonial relationship between the US Government and Washingtonians. I conclude by calling for a deeper engagement with the American public school system by Middle East Studies scholars at both a theoretical and practical level
Colonialism · Conversation · Epistemology · Ethnography · Explanatory power · Middle East · Political science · Praxis · Sociology · Anthropology · Critical Race Theory in Education · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|