“There Will Still Be Television but I Don’t Know What It Will Be Called!”
Narrating the End of Television in Australia and New Zealand
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21225218 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Given (0000-0003-4137-8387, Swinburne University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 109-122 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Media and Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2183-2439 • E-ISSN: 2183-2439 |
| Publisher | Cogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT) |
| DOI | 10.17645/mac.v4i3.561 |
| OpenAlex | W2461864457 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 6 |
Australia and New Zealand, like other countries, have unique TV systems and practices that shape the possibilities enabled by emerging technologies, enterprises, behaviors and ideas. This article explores two recent articulations of the concept of television that have motivated ‘end of television’ narratives in the two countries. One is future-oriented – the introduction of online subscription video services from local providers like Fetch TV, Presto, Stan and from March 2015, the international giant Netflix. It draws on a survey of senior people in TV, technology, advertising, production, audience measurement and social media conducted in late 2014 and early 2015. The other is recent history – the switchover from analogue to digital terrestrial television, completed in both countries in December 2013. Digital TV switchover was a global policy implemented in markedly different ways. Television was transformed, though not in the precise ways anticipated. Rather than being in the center of the digital revolution, as the digital TV industry and policy pioneers enthused, broadcast television was, to some extent, overrun by it. The most successful online subscription video service in Australia and New Zealand so far, Netflix, talks up the end of television but serves up a very specific form of it. The article poses a slightly different question to whether or not television is ending: that is, whether, in the post-broadcast, digital era, distinctions between unique TV systems and practices will endure, narrow, dissolve, or morph into new forms of difference
Advertising · Art · Business · Digital television · Interactive television · Internet television · Media studies · Narrative · Political science · Service (business) · Service provider · Sociology · Switchover · Telecommunications · Cinema and Media Studies · Computer Science · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Marketing · Media Studies and Communication
Receptive academic vocabulary knowledge and extramural English involvement – is there a correlation
Making TV
Faire (de) la télévision
Influencia de la Televisión Social en los Noticieros Ecuatorianos
Access for everyone? Australia’s ‘streaming wars’ and consumers with disabilities
Video-on-demand affordability
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and nonbinary representation on Australian scripted television in the 2000s and 2010s
The domestic ecology of Australian subscription video on demand services
The first stage of Australia's digital transition and its implications for Australian television drama
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |