I feel like and it feels like

Two paths to the emergence of epistemic markers

Bibliographic Data

ID21226595
AuthorsMarisa Brooks (0000-0003-0400-2962, University of Toronto, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume6
Issue1
Publication date2020-01-28
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLinguistics Vanguard (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2199-174X • E-ISSN: 2199-174X
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/lingvan-2018-0068
OpenAlexW3092479361
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited36

The collocation I feel like has attracted American media attention for reportedly being newly ubiquitous (Baker 2013, Smith 2015, Worthen 2016). While I have proposed that it is becoming an epistemic marker in North American dialects of English (Brook 2011: 65), I have made this prediction of (it) feels like as well. The present study artificially restricts the conventional envelope of variation to evaluate what distinguishes these two phrases in vernacular Canadian English. I feel like is the more frequent by far, but (it) feels like shows a specialization for metaphorical subordinate clauses rather than concrete ones. I interpret this as a case of persistence (Torres Cacoullos and Walker 2009). Before the arrival of the like complementizer, the only predecessors to ’(it) feels like were (it) feels as if and (it) feels as though , and both as if and as though have a preference for metaphoricality (Brook 2014). I feel like was also preceded by options with ’ as if and as though , but counterbalanced with that and Ø, which prefer concrete subordinate clauses (Brook 2014). The results attest to the value to be found in (cautiously) conducting a microscopic study of a corner of the envelope of variation

Complementizer · Epistemology · Linguistics · Physics · Preference · Statistics · Syntax · Vernacular · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

Tools

Open DOI