Contesting spaces
An examination of the prepositional phrases v/na Ukraine and iz/s Ukraine in Russian X discourse
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21235340 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frances Junnier (0000-0002-3779-9771, Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City), Galina Shleykina (0000-0003-0227-2555, Southeastern Oklahoma State University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2213-1272 • E-ISSN: 2213-1280 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/jlac.00121.jun |
| OpenAlex | W4401926354 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
In this study, we investigate the use of two pairs of Russian prepositions— v / na (‘in/on’) and iz/s (‘from’) with the noun Ukraine in X discourse. Since Ukrainian independence in 1991, v Ukraine and iz Ukraine have been used to indicate Ukrainian sovereignty and na and s used as their unmarked counterparts as defined by Russian linguistic tradition. Using a web-based set of tools called TWIG, we examine how posts containing the prepositional phrases construct stances toward the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Specifically, we examine the frequency of the prepositional phrases, their collocations, and the semantics conveyed by the collocational patterns. Our findings show notable differences in the collocational patterns of posts using v Ukraine versus na Ukraine . Analysis of these collocations suggests that posts using v Ukraine have a proximation effect to the conflict, while those using na Ukraine have a distancing effect
Linguistics · Noun · Political science · Ukrainian · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy
Analysing Political Discourse
Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? — The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies
Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding
Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation
The stance triangle
Xenophobic Trumpeters
Collocations and semantic profiles
The case for case in Putin’s speeches
Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population
Lard-eaters, gay-ropeans, sheeple and prepositions
Normal straight gays
Do social media create revolutions? Using Twitter sentiment analysis for predicting the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine
Representing the Windrush generation
The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers
Utterly content in each other's company
Ukraine
Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’
War against our Children’
Affective stance as positioning in an English-speaking online fan community
Russian Twitter Accounts and the Partisan Polarization of Vaccine Discourse, 2015–2017
Greece, the Netherlands and (the) Ukraine
Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum
Broadcasting Messages via Telegram
Positioning
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
The dynamics of stance constructions
The pragmatics of hashtags
Euphemisms and non-proximal manipulation of discourse space
The 1st person plural in political discourse-American politicians in interviews and in a debate
Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts
Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse
"Fraternal" nations and challenges to sovereignty in Ukraine
| Highly cited | No |
|---|