Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contesting spaces

An examination of the prepositional phrases v/na Ukraine and iz/s Ukraine in Russian X discourse

Bibliographic Data

ID21235340
AuthorsFrances Junnier (0000-0002-3779-9771, Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City), Galina Shleykina (0000-0003-0227-2555, Southeastern Oklahoma State University)
Year2024
Publication date2024-08-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Language Aggression and Conflict (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2213-1272 • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/jlac.00121.jun
OpenAlexW4401926354
LanguageEN
References cited50

In this study, we investigate the use of two pairs of Russian prepositions— v / na (‘in/on’) and iz/s (‘from’) with the noun Ukraine in X discourse. Since Ukrainian independence in 1991, v Ukraine and iz Ukraine have been used to indicate Ukrainian sovereignty and na and s used as their unmarked counterparts as defined by Russian linguistic tradition. Using a web-based set of tools called TWIG, we examine how posts containing the prepositional phrases construct stances toward the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Specifically, we examine the frequency of the prepositional phrases, their collocations, and the semantics conveyed by the collocational patterns. Our findings show notable differences in the collocational patterns of posts using v Ukraine versus na Ukraine . Analysis of these collocations suggests that posts using v Ukraine have a proximation effect to the conflict, while those using na Ukraine have a distancing effect

Linguistics · Noun · Political science · Ukrainian · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy

  • Analysing Political Discourse

    Paul Chilton•Analysing Political Discourse•2004

  • Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? — The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies

    Bill Louw•Text and Technology•1993

  • Fleeing, Sneaking, Flooding

    Open Access•Costas Gabrielatos, Paul Baker•Journal of English Linguistics•2008

  • Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation

    Open Access•Michele Zappavigna•Discourse & Communication•2014

  • The stance triangle

    John W Du Bois•Stancetaking in discourse•2007

  • Xenophobic Trumpeters

    Natalia Knoblock•Journal of Language Aggression…•2017

  • Collocations and semantic profiles

    Matilda Stubbs, Michael Stubbs•Functions of Language•1995

  • The case for case in Putin’s speeches

    Open Access•Laura A Janda, Masako Fidler et al.•Russian Linguistics•2023

  • Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population

    Open Access•Jonathan Mellon, Christopher Prosser•Research & Politics•2017

  • Lard-eaters, gay-ropeans, sheeple and prepositions

    Anne Marie Devlin•Russian Journal of Communication•2016

  • Normal straight gays

    Ksenija Bogetić•Gender and Language•2013

  • Do social media create revolutions? Using Twitter sentiment analysis for predicting the Maidan Revolution in Ukraine

    Open Access•Iana Sabatovych•Global Media and Communication•2019

  • Representing the Windrush generation

    Charlotte Taylor•Critical Discourse Studies•2018

  • The impact of linguistic choices and (para-)linguistic markers on the perception of Twitter complaints by other customers

    Nicolas Ruytenbeek, Sofie Decock et al.•Journal of Politeness Research•2022

  • Utterly content in each other's company

    Alan Partington•International Journal of Corpus…•2004

  • Ukraine

    Taras Kuzio•Journal of Communist Studies•1998

  • Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’

    Open Access•Michael Kranert•Discourse & Society•2017

  • War against our Children’

    Open Access•Innocent Chiluwa, Presley Ifukor•Discourse & Society•2015

  • Affective stance as positioning in an English-speaking online fan community

    Open Access•Ylva Biri•Journal of Pragmatics•2023

  • Russian Twitter Accounts and the Partisan Polarization of Vaccine Discourse, 2015–2017

    Dror Walter, Yotam Ophir et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2020

  • Greece, the Netherlands and (the) Ukraine

    Open Access•Heiko Motschenbacher•Names•2020

  • Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum

    Open Access•Miha Grćar, Darko Cherepnalkoski et al.•Computational Social Networks•2017

  • Broadcasting Messages via Telegram

    Daria Kuznetsova•Political Communication•2024

  • Positioning

    Open Access•B Davies, Rom Harré•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1990

  • A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press

    Open Access•P Baker, Costas Gabrielatos et al.•Discourse & Society•2008

  • The dynamics of stance constructions

    Open Access•Gunther Kaltenböck, María José López-Couso et al.•Language Sciences•2020

  • The pragmatics of hashtags

    Open Access•Kate Scott•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • Euphemisms and non-proximal manipulation of discourse space

    Open Access•Jan Chovanec•Lingua•2019

  • The 1st person plural in political discourse-American politicians in interviews and in a debate

    Open Access•Katarzyna Proctor, Lily I-Wen Su•Journal of Pragmatics•2011

  • Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts

    Open Access•Jessie Burnette, Andreea S Calude•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse

    Open Access•Piotr Cap•Journal of Pragmatics•2008

  • "Fraternal" nations and challenges to sovereignty in Ukraine

    Open Access•Catherine Wanner•American Ethnologist•2014

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae