Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Issue in Printing Mushaf Quran

Dispute in Science of ‘Adad and its Application in Printing Mushaf Quran

Bibliographic Data

ID21236612
AuthorsAbd Muhaimin Ahmad (0000-0002-5017-3538, University of the Holy Quran and Islamic Sciences), Sabri Mohamad (University of the Holy Quran and Islamic Sciences), Haziyah Hussin (0000-0003-2014-387X, University of the Holy Quran and Islamic Sciences)
Year2015
Volume8
Issue1
Pages104-115
Publication date2015-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Islamic Thought (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2232-1314 • E-ISSN: 2289-6023
PublisherDepartment of Theology and Philosophy, UKM (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.24035/ijit.08.2015.009
OpenAlexW2929036369
LanguageEN

The science of `adad constitutes an integral part of Quranic-affiliated knowledge. Its main discussion is about the beginning and ending of the verse of the Quran as well as distinction numbering of the verses. There are seven famous opinions in `adad, namely; Madani Awwal, Madani Akhir, Makki, Kufi, Basri, Shami and Himshi. The difference of opinions in the determination of Quranic verses does not only affect the calculation of the total number of verses in the Qur'an, but also contribute to the differences in the nature of mushaf (printed Quran). This is because the scholars have variant views on determining the madhdhab (opinion) of 'adad relied upon by some qiraat mutawatirah and its riwayah. Thus, this study explores and gathers the views of the scholars in determining the madhdhab (opinion) for respective qiraat mutawatirah, and identify their justifications. This study will then examine the effect of the dispute on mushaf Quran. To achieve the aforementioned objectives, content analysis method was adopted to bring together the views of scholars in determining opinions for each qiraat mutawatirah, and to analyze descriptively the narrations of all opinions to explain the cause of the disagreement among the scholars. In order to know the impact of the differences in `adad on mushaf Quran, induction methods was used on the mushaf Quran which has been printed in several countries with distinctive qiraat mutawatirah. This study finds that the sanad (chain of transmitter) in narrating `adad forms is the contributing factor in dissenting scholars in determining credible opinion for each qiraat mutawatirah. In regards to the printing of mushaf, most of the printed mushafs are aligned with the opinion of scholars in determining the number of the verses, whereas only a few of mushaf which do not comply with such opinion

Political science · Printing press · Education and Islamic Studies · History · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · Law · Philosophy · Qur’anic Interpretation Studies

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae