Respect for Numbers

Bibliographic Data

ID21237447
AuthorsCatelijne Coopmans (0000-0001-7619-5770, Linköping University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Pages109-126
Publication date2018-11-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience & Technology Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2243-4690 • E-ISSN: 2243-4690
PublisherScience and Technology Studies (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.23987/sts.56747
OpenAlexW2904070448
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited16

This paper explores an episode of numbers appearing on a screen and being read/spoken, looked at and received as numbers, by people who work together to achieve a particular goal. The events happened in Singapore, in 2012-2013, as part of periodic reporting on diabetic retinopathy screening in the context of efforts to innovate such screening. I tell of two parties at odds over how to engage numbers accountably. This question of ‘engagement’, of what can and should be done with numbers to secure their participation in organizational affairs, is worked out in how numerical forms are performed and sustained as working numbers. Using three STS analytics to analyse the episode – Helen Verran’s (2001) work on number as a relation of unity/plurality, John Law’s (1994) work on modes of ordering, and Steve Woolgar and Daniel Neyland’s (2013) work on mundaneity and accountability – I argue that numbers are brought to life in very different ways, each mobilizing a certain recognition of what numbers are and what it takes to respect this. In the conclusion, I comment on the article’s use and juxtaposition of these STS analytics, using the metaphor of a kaleidoscope

Accountability · Analytics · Data science · Kaleidoscope · Linguistics · Metaphor · Odds · Political science · Sociology · African history and culture studies · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Computer Science · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · History · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access