Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sobre formalismos y antiformalismos en la Teoría del Derecho

Bibliographic Data

ID21238228
AuthorsJuan Antonio García Amado (0000-0003-3096-4428, Universidad de León, corresponding author)
Year2014
Issue3
Pages13-43
Publication date2014-09-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2253-6655 • E-ISSN: 2253-6655
PublisherUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid (PUBLISHER • ES)
DOI10.20318/eunomia.2012.2091
OpenAlexW7140148504
LanguageES

The author reviews the characteristics of formalist and anti-formalist perspectives that inform judicial decisions. He disapproves the acritical propensity to associate formalism and positivism. Iusmoralist thinkers such as Dworkin and Alexy, and the followers of neoconstitutionalism, are also the victims of the formalist influence as well as the metaphysic positivist jurists of the 19th century. Therefore it is necessary to acknowledge that Law is expressed through certain statements invested with official authority by legal sources. Judges’ decisions based on Law must be adopted in accordance with normative statements. Taking into account these circumstances positivist thinkers assume that judicial discretion is unavoidable

Discretion · Judicial discretion · Jurisprudence · Legal norm · Legal positivism · Normative · Positivism · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · Comparative International Legal Studies · Legal processes and jurisprudence

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae