Sobre formalismos y antiformalismos en la Teoría del Derecho
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21238228 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Juan Antonio García Amado (0000-0003-3096-4428, Universidad de León, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 13-43 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2253-6655 • E-ISSN: 2253-6655 |
| Publisher | Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (PUBLISHER • ES) |
| DOI | 10.20318/eunomia.2012.2091 |
| OpenAlex | W7140148504 |
| Language | ES |
The author reviews the characteristics of formalist and anti-formalist perspectives that inform judicial decisions. He disapproves the acritical propensity to associate formalism and positivism. Iusmoralist thinkers such as Dworkin and Alexy, and the followers of neoconstitutionalism, are also the victims of the formalist influence as well as the metaphysic positivist jurists of the 19th century. Therefore it is necessary to acknowledge that Law is expressed through certain statements invested with official authority by legal sources. Judges’ decisions based on Law must be adopted in accordance with normative statements. Taking into account these circumstances positivist thinkers assume that judicial discretion is unavoidable
Discretion · Judicial discretion · Jurisprudence · Legal norm · Legal positivism · Normative · Positivism · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · Comparative International Legal Studies · Legal processes and jurisprudence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |