Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Repetition in discourses across languages and genres

Bibliographic Data

ID21239683
AuthorsKamal Abdullayev (Azerbaijan University of Languages), Azad Mammadov (0000-0002-8357-1356, Azerbaijan University of Languages), Misgar Mammadov (0000-0001-5051-8631, Azerbaijan University), Shaban Huseynov (Azerbaijan University)
Year2024
Volume10
Issue1
Publication date2024-08-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueOpen Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2300-9969 • E-ISSN: 2300-9969
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/opli-2024-0020
OpenAlexW4401516492
LanguageEN
References cited13

Despite the fact that various functions of repetition in discourse have been studied, we have decided to continue our exploration of the role of phonetic and lexical repetitions in the pragmatics and cognition of text and discourse focusing our attention on the epic texts and modern literary discourses across languages. The reason why we have decided to analyze both epic texts and modern literary discourses across languages is our intention to reveal the pragmatic nature of intersubjective behaviors regardless of time and place. In addition, phonetic and lexical repetitions play a crucial role in the cognition of these texts and discourses as they cause associations by stimulating knowledge in the human mind. Thus, our article’s goal is to analyze the ways why and how the sender uses these very important explicit linguistic devices to produce pragmatic and cognitive effects on the audience of the epic texts, as well as on the participants of modern fictional discourses in English, Azerbaijani, and Russian. Throughout the history, phonetic and lexical repetitions have gradually become key devices in producing pragmatic and cognitive effects in literary discourses across languages. The examples from Beowulf , The Book of Dede Korkut , as well as from modern fictional and poetic discourses in Azerbaijani and English clearly demonstrate this trend. We can draw a conclusion that as human’s life experience and his/her intellectual level gradually develops, the functions of these repetitions in discourse expand and gain a new meaning. Repetition is a choice made by the sender of any text, first of all, based on his/her subjective individual rather than social preferences. That is why the use of repetition in discourse motivates intersubjective behaviors regardless of time and place

Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy

  • Metaphor in Literature

    Open Access•Elena Semino, Gerard Steen et al.•Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor…•2008

  • Intersubjectivity in perception

    Open Access•Shaun Gallagher•Man and World•2008

  • Participant continuity and narrative structure

    Brita Warvik•Folia Linguistica Historica•2013

  • The Terrible Bite of Fire

    Nelson Goering•English Studies•2020

  • Stylistic Use of Phraseological Units in Discourse

    Open Access•Anita Načisčione•Stylistic use of phraseological…•2010

  • Parallel structures in syntax

    Open Access•Grant Goodall•Lingua•1988

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae