Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Valiko Jugeli and the Сult of the People’s Guard in Georgia

Bibliographic Data

ID21241279
AuthorsFrancis King (0000-0002-2233-7320, University of East Anglia, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume9
Issue1
Publication date2021-04-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuaestio Rossica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2311-911X • E-ISSN: 2313-6871
PublisherUral Federal University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.15826/qr.2021.1.566
OpenAlexW3147028063
LanguageEN

This article looks at the semiofficial cult of the Red (People’s) Guard in Georgia from 1917 to 1921. The guard originated in the chaos and uncertainty of late 1917 and played a key role in securing the power of Noy Zhordania and the social democrats in Georgia against Bolshevik and other challenges. It also served as the power base for its undisputed leader, Valiko Jugeli. The official and party press fostered a heroic cult around the Guard, its exploits, and its leadership, reflected in Jugeli’s diary-style memoir, A Heavy Cross (1920). The guard’s cultivated image was selfless, politically conscious, internationalist, and devoted to the revolution. Its many critics saw it as thuggish, undisciplined, chauvinistic, corrupt, and militarily ineffective. The mutual dependency between Zhordania and Jugeli ensured that the guard was politically untouchable in Georgia. The need to maintain the loyalty of the guard, and gain the support of Jugeli, was at times a crucial factor in the politics of the country. Ultimately, the power and influence of the guard eroded the effectiveness of Georgia’s armed forces, and its treatment of national minorities, particularly Armenians and Ossetians, helped Bolsheviks inside and outside Georgia undermine and then overthrow the Democratic Republic. After the Sovietisation of Georgia in 1921, the record of the guard was used to discredit the social democrats’ democratic credentials domestically and internationally. Since around 1990, the guards’ South Ossetia campaigns of 1918–1920 have been used to underpin the area’s claims for independence from rule by Tbilisi

Cult · Loyalty · Political science · Politics · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Soviet and Russian History

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae