What Asean Must Learn from Timor-Leste
A Tripartite Analysis on Australian Foreign Policy Related to Timor Sea Treaty 2018
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21243387 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Indra Kusumawardhana (0000-0002-2754-2323, Pertamina (Indonesia)), Gustin Saptarani Dewi (Pertamina (Indonesia)) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-02-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2338-1353 • E-ISSN: 2338-1361 |
| Editora | Universitas Bina Nusantara (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.21512/jas.v11i2.7050 |
| OpenAlex | W4391784001 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
The Timor Gap had been a hotspot of territorial dispute between Australia and Timor-Leste. In 2018, Australia finally agreed to settle a permanent maritime boundary in favour of Timor-Leste. Why was Australia willing to sacrifice the border and give a favourable outcome to Timor-Leste? The research examined the importance of the tripartite approach to Foreign Policy analysis to understand why a country may choose seemingly unfavourable options in territorial disputes. The analysis showed how Australian foreign policy was influenced by agency-structure interactions within the international system. The research demonstrated that structural constraints at the international level influenced Australia’s decision, including the South China Sea dispute between ASEAN members and China, previous agreements Australia-Timor-Leste on the management of the Timor Gap, and domestic political dynamics in Australia. The research reveals a relationship between actors’ structural and dispositional dimensions in foreign policy. In the case of Australia, there is a strong link between democratic values and respect for the international rules-based order. Altogether, this situation prompted Australia to continue negotiations with Timor-Leste over the Timor Gap and ultimately to accept an agreement for maritime delimitation in Timor-Leste’s favor
Business · Development economics · Economics · Foreign policy · International trade · Political science · Politics · Timor leste · Treaty · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
Examining the debt implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a policy perspective
Política entre las naciones
Handbook of International Relations
Pacific Cooperation
Foreign Policy in a Constructed World
The Unbreakable Relations Between Indonesia-Vietnam Post “Sink the Vessels” Policy
Agenda Setting within Asean
The Debate Over the Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians
“Marching Westwards”
The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte
The Peacock’s Tale
Managing Territorial Disputes in Southeast Asia
Australia, China and the maritime ‘rules-based international order’
Timor-Leste’s foreign policy approach to the Timor Sea disputes
Realism
The Timor Sea Conciliation
Hyper-precarious lives
Revitalizing the Rebalance
Maritime Territorialization, UNCLOS and the Timor Sea Dispute
Methodological Individualism and Social Explanation
Constitution Making during State Building
The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis
Territoriality and beyond
Anarchy is what states make of it
Alliances, balance, and stability
Power in International Politics
The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy
What is to be done? Foreign Policy as a Site for Political Action
The Language of Foreign Policy
Liberalism and World Politics
On the banality of wilful blindness
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,33 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |