Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences Between the Creativity of People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Those With Typical Hearing

A Protocol for the Further Scoping Review

Bibliographic Data

ID21243564
AuthorsPetra Potměšilová (0000-0002-3423-488X, Palacký University Olomouc), Miloň Potměšil (0000-0001-5386-1902, Palacký University Olomouc), Miloslav Klugar (0000-0002-2804-7295, Masaryk University)
Year2024
Volume17
Issue1
Pages152-164
Publication date2024-03-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCreativity Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2345-0487 • E-ISSN: 2345-0479
PublisherVilnius Gediminas Technical University (PUBLISHER • LT)
DOI10.3846/cs.2024.15890
OpenAlexW4392864320
LanguageEN
References cited41

As a step prescribed by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology before conducting a scoping review, the protocol aims to describe differences in creativity between deaf and hard of hearing and typically hearing people. Creativity as a mental process is important for the development of personality, imagination, communication skills, and interpersonal relationships. For this study, the focus was on creativity of deaf and hard of hearing persons. Deaf and hard of hearing people show specific characteristics in their mode of creativity. All the studies that deal with creativity in deaf and hard of hearing people will be included. Studies of any design in English, German, or Czech will be accepted as sources for assessment and analysis for systematic review. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for a scoping review will act as a framework for the review that will be prepared. 14 scientific databases will be chosen for this review. Two independent reviewers will identify and evaluate all the titles and abstracts that are acquired. The selected data will be extracted and reported in tabular form and a descriptive format

Audiology · Creativity · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Spatial Cognition and Navigation

  • Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality

    Mark Batey, A Furnham•Genetic Social and General…•2006

  • Chapter 11

    Micah D J Peters, Micah Peters et al.•2019

  • Creativity

    Beth A Hennessey, Teresa M Amabile•Annual Review of Psychology•2010

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • The Standard Definition of Creativity

    Mark A Runco, Garrett J Jaeger•Creativity Research Journal•2012

  • Interdependencies between openness and creativity of fifth graders

    Caroline Theurer, Wida Rogh et al.•Psychology of Aesthetics…•2021

  • Defining Creativity

    Anthony Brandt, Anthony K Brandt•Creativity Research Journal•2021

  • Identifying Linguistic Creativity in Deaf and Hearing Children

    Marc Marschark, Victoria S Everhart et al.•Metaphor and Symbolic Activity•1987

  • Shift of Creativity Concepts

    Open Access•Gintarė Adomaitytė, Viktorija Žilinskaitė et al.•Filosofija. Sociologija•2018

  • The impact of hearing impairment on early academic achievement in Aboriginal children living in remote Australia

    Open Access•Jiunn‐Yih Su, Steven Guthridge et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Assessing Aspects of Creativity in Deaf and Hearing High School Students

    Christopher M Stanzione, Stephanie M Perez et al.•The Journal of Deaf Studies and…•2013

  • Frank Barron and the Study of Creativity

    Open Access•Ruth Richards•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae