Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Catholicism and Evolution

Polygenism and Original Sin (Part II)

Bibliographic Data

ID21244852
AuthorsJames R Hofmann (0000-0001-6890-2148, California State University, Fullerton, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume9
Issue1
Pages63-129
Publication date2021-03-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientia et Fides (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2353-5636 • E-ISSN: 2300-7648
PublisherUniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.12775/setf.2021.003
OpenAlexW3118526771
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited5

As documented in Part I, monogenism, the descent of all human beings from Adam and Eve, was closely linked to the Catholic doctrine of original sin throughout the first half of the twentieth century. Theological reservations about polygenism, the more scientifically supported account of human origins through a transitional population, was brought to a head by Pius XII’s 1950 encyclical Humani generis. Although the encyclical allowed discussion of human evolution, polygenism was prohibited because “It does not appear how such a view can be reconciled with the doctrine of original sin.” Nevertheless, during and after Vatican II de facto theological acceptance of polygenism became commonplace even though the prohibition was not withdrawn. While some modern conceptions of original sin make a reliance upon monogenism unnecessary, another school of thought emphasizes a spiritual rather than a biological understanding of the concept. It remains to be seen whether polygenism can be unanimously accepted as a scientific phenomenon that is not theologically threatening. Reflection on the Vatican’s long period of ambivalence about the motion of the earth suggests that a similar prospect can be foreseen for polygenism even though it is subject to development in a manner that geostasis was not

Ambivalence · De facto · Doctrine · Encyclical · Epistemology · Original sin · Phenomenon · Political science · Population · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Theology · Evolution and Science Education · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

  • The Evolving Taxonomy of Progressive Creation

    Open Access•James R Hofmann•Scientia et Fides•2023

  • Humani Generis & Evolution

    Open Access•Kenneth W Kemp•Scientia et Fides•2023

  • Thomistic Hylomorphism and Theistic Evolution

    Open Access•James R Hofmann•Scientia et Fides•2023

  • Monogenism Revisited

    Open Access•Wojciech P Grygiel, Olaf Lizak•Religions•2025

  • Contemporary Version of the Monogenetic Model of Anthropogenesis-Some Critical Remarks from the Thomistic Perspective

    Open Access•Mariusz Tabaczek•Religions•2023

  • Erich Wasmann, S.J

    Open Access•James R Hofmann•Journal of Jesuit Studies•2020

  • A Vision Transformed

    Open Access•Ursula King•The Heythrop Journal•2013

  • The Pharisee Against the Hellenist

    Open Access•Robert Coogan•Renaissance Quarterly•1986

  • General

    Open Access•Margaret Mead•American Anthropologist•1961

  • Our Hearts of Darkness

    Open Access•Stephen J Duffy•Theological Studies•1988

Citations per year1.67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae