A Shared Task for the Digital Humanities Chapter 2
Evaluating Annotation Guidelines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21245381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Evelyn Gius (0000-0001-8888-8419), Nils Reiter (0000-0003-3193-6170), Marcus Wielland |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2019-12-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cultural Analytics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2371-4549 • E-ISSN: 2371-4549 |
| Publisher | CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22148/16.049 |
| OpenAlex | W2988314392 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
In this section, we will discuss our idea of guideline evaluation and the underlying considerations. Evaluating annotation guidelines in this way is a fairly new endeavor, and we have developed the evaluation setup from the ground up. Although we do not claim our choices to be universally valid or applicable, we believe that this approach to guideline evaluation is relevant for similar settings and can be adapted to projects that might have other preferences and priorities
Annotation · Data science · Guideline · Political science · Systems engineering · Computer Science · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Engineering · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Artificial Intelligence
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |