The Environment of South African Journalism
Are Mainstream Media Organisations Listening to Activists
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21245643 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thandi Bombi (0009-0007-9232-6348, Rhodes University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 98-114 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African Journalism Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2374-3670 • E-ISSN: 2374-3689 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23743670.2024.2435949 |
| OpenAlex | W4406341821 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
The Shell seismic survey on the South African Wild Coast was scheduled to begin on 1 December 2021. After multiple court proceedings, a failed interdict, countrywide protest action and then a successful interdict, the seismic survey was stopped. Although activism around the survey was available on blogs, social media, and activist sites, only a few media organisations in South Africa picked up the story before December 2021. This study aims to interrogate the state of climate journalism in South Africa by analysing the reportage of the Shell seismic survey in November 2021. The paper uses Macnamara’s seven canons of organisational listening to answer two central questions: what was said (on public platforms) by climate activists in 2021 about the Shell seismic survey? And did mainstream media organisations listen to the activists? The sample of the study includes news articles written by mainstream news organisations and activist communication, freely available in the public domain. An in-depth media content analysis is conducted to determine whether organisational listening is taking place and understand who mainstream media organisations in South African are listening to with regards matters of the climate emergency. This is done by grounding the theoretical emphasis in organisational listening (following Macnamara), which emphasises recognition, acknowledgement, attention, interpretation, understanding, consideration, and response to stakeholders
Active listening · Alternative media · Citizen journalism · Citizen media · Journalism · Mainstream · Media studies · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Selling Science
Why Voice Matters
The Dissonance of Democracy
Making Climate HOT
The political economy of climate change reporting in Nigeria
Climate Hypocrisies
Trump and the Rise of the Media-Industrial Complex in American Politics
The Media and Public Perceptions of Risk
Listening for Democracy
Ethnic Minorities and the Media
Personally Relevant Climate Change
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond
From listening … to the dialogic realities of participatory democracy
Blogging and tweeting climate change in South Africa
The challenge of climate change for journalism in Africa
Sexing up’ environmental issues
Climate change and the possibility of ‘slow journalism’
The case for ‘green pen journalism’ in an age of globalisation and liberalisation
Systemic challenges to reporting complexity in journalism
Political economy, media, and climate change
Media, Politics and Climate Change
NGO Influence in International Environmental Negotiations
Japan's emerging role as a 'global ordinary power
Listening across difference
The trouble with ‘quiet advocacy’
Media and Democracy in Africa
Struggle for the sands of Xolobeni – From post-colonial environmental injustice to crisis of democracy
The economic specification of media ownership in South Africa
Reporting Conventions
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |