Census-based urban building energy modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of retrofit programs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21246863 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yael Nidam (0000-0002-2637-3054, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author), Ali Irani (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Jamie Bemis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Christoph Reinhart (0000-0001-6311-0416, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 2394-2406 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2399-8083 • E-ISSN: 2399-8091 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23998083231154576 |
| OpenAlex | W4318822996 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 28 |
Housing retrofits are essential for meeting societal decarbonization goals, alongside addressing energy insecurity, improving public health, and creating new jobs. Yet, despite their multiple benefits and comprehensive government efforts to incentivize retrofits, adoption rates across the world remain low, usually less than 1% per year. Barriers to adoption among homeowners include lack of knowledge of what combination of energy retrofitting upgrades are most cost effective for their situation given available incentive programs. Similarly, cities lack urban-level analysis tools to optimize uptake of and predict carbon emissions reduction from existing incentive programs. To address the latter gap, we present a census-based Urban Building Energy Modeling framework that combines a technical energy saving potential analysis with a socioeconomic model that includes occupant demographics, local building regulations, and incentive eligibility criteria. We use the framework to evaluate the effectiveness of retrofit programs in two Boston neighborhoods with median incomes of $110,00 and $42,000. Results reveal that for the higher income, neighborhood predicted and actual adoption rates between 2014 and 2017 are comparable. In the lower income neighborhood, the proportion of households that would financially benefit from incentive offerings is higher. However, current participation rates do not reflect this difference suggesting that many viable projects do not happen for reasons that are not yet captured by the model. Urban planners, energy policy designers, and community advocates seeking to plan and evaluate energy incentive programs can use this framework to understand the breakdown of opportunities and barriers for different socio-demographic groups and geographic locations
Business · Census · Demographics · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Geography · Incentive · Incentive program · Population · Public economics · Retrofitting · Socioeconomic status · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Energy Efficiency and Management · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Engineering
Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey
Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap
Putting renewables and energy efficiency to work
EnergyPlus
The carbon footprint of household energy use in the United States
Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions
Urban building energy modeling – A review of a nascent field
High energy burden and low-income energy affordability
Ubem.io
Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap
Disparities in rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the United States by race and ethnicity
Energy Burden and the Need for Integrated Low‐Income Housing and Energy Policy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |