Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can administrative division adjustment improve urban land use efficiency? Evidence from “Revoke County to Urban District” in China

Bibliographic Data

ID21247540
AuthorsBinbin Yu (0000-0001-5886-4563, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, corresponding author), Yue Hu (0000-0002-2829-3971, Xiamen University), Yajing Hu (Xiamen University), Xinru Zhou (0009-0006-7247-8566, Zhejiang Gongshang University)
Year2025
Volume52
Issue9
Pages2099-2119
Publication date2025-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2399-8083 • E-ISSN: 2399-8091
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/23998083251325638
OpenAlexW4408344175
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited39

Government-led administrative division adjustment has occurred throughout the various stages of China’s social development and serves as a significant driving force for urbanization in the country. As representative of administrative division adjustment, the Revoke County to Urban District (RCUD) policy has played a crucial role in the urbanization process in China. The question must therefore be asked as to whether RCUD does indeed enhance urban land use efficiency (ULUE). This has significant implications for China’s new-type urbanization strategy and high-quality economic development. This paper constructs a research framework on the relationship between RCUD and ULUE, and empirically examines the effect of RCUD on ULUE using data from Chinese prefecture-level and above cities. The results show that RCUD significantly promotes improvements to ULUE, and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. The policy effect of RCUD exhibits heterogeneity, not only in terms of economic development but also in terms of city size and in terms of RCUD reform experience. The effect improvements to RCUD have on ULUE is more pronounced in economically developed cities. Furthermore, RCUD significantly increases ULUE only in large cities and above; the impact of RCUD is greater in cities with prior experience. Mechanism tests reveal that promoting elements agglomeration and optimizing industrial structure are important channels by which RCUD can enhance ULUE; however, the disorderly expansion of boundaries triggered by RCUD has adverse effects on ULUE. The research findings provide theoretical support and reference for optimizing further RCUD reform and enhancing ULUE

Administrative division · Archaeology · Business · China · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Urban district · Housing Market and Economics · Law · Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis · Spatial and Panel Data Analysis

  • Administrative‐Led Urbanisation and Migrants’ Settlement Intention

    Open Access•Jing Li, Bin Yang et al.•Population Space and Place•2026

  • Quantifying urban adaptation planning in flood-prone communities of Islamabad, Pakistan

    Open Access•Hassam Bin Waseem, Irfan Ahmad Rana•International Journal of Disaster…•2025

  • Urban walkability assessment

    Open Access•Hamza Chaudhary, Mahmood et al.•Environment Development and…•2025

  • Is there really a foreign ownership wage premium? Evidence from matched employer–employee data

    Open Access•Fredrik Heyman, Fredrik Sjöholm et al.•Journal of International Economics•2007

  • The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior

    M Keith Chen•American Economic Review•2013

  • A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis

    Open Access•Kaoru Tone•European Journal of Operational…•2002

  • Ecological effects of new-type urbanization in China

    Open Access•Binbin Yu•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2021

  • Nursery Cities

    Gilles Duranton, Diego Puga•American Economic Review•2001

  • Political turnover and economic performance

    Open Access•Hongbin Li, Li-An Zhou et al.•Journal of Public Economics•2005

  • Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods

    Open Access•Brantly Callaway, Pedro H C Sant’Anna•Journal of Econometrics•2021

  • The impact of government support and market competition on China's high-tech industry innovation efficiency as an emerging market

    Open Access•Qunchao Wan, Jiangfeng Ye et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Measuring the coupling of built-up land intensity and use efficiency

    Open Access•Linlin Ruan, Tingting He et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2022

  • Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China

    Open Access•Pei Li, Yi Lü et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2016

  • Urbanization path, housing price and land finance

    Open Access•Yuan Liu, Hong Gao et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • How regional economic integration influence on urban land use efficiency? A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area, China

    Open Access•Xin Gao, Anlu Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Study the effect of industrial structure optimization on urban land-use efficiency in China

    Open Access•Jingming Liu, Xianhui Hou et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Spatiotemporal effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion in China

    Open Access•Rundong Feng, Kaiyong Wang•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China

    Open Access•Junqing Yu, YU Jun-qing et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Urban land use efficiency and improvement potential in China

    Open Access•Shuchang Liu, Wu Xiao et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • How does industrial agglomeration affect urban land use efficiency? A spatial analysis of Chinese cities

    Open Access•Wenxi Zhang, Bo Wang et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Reflections on China's food security and land use policy under rapid urbanization

    Open Access•Yansui Liu, Yang Zhou•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Government-driven urbanisation and its impact on regional economic growth in China

    Open Access•Tao Hong, Nannan Yu et al.•Cities•2021

  • How does urban agglomeration integration promote entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from regional human capital spillovers and market integration

    Open Access•Siqi Zheng, Rui Du•Cities•2020

  • How do cities foster autonomous planning practices despite top-down control

    Open Access•Narquis Barak, Nir Barak et al.•Cities•2022

  • Does regional economic integration promote urban land use efficiency? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China

    Open Access•Jiangmeng Zhao, Daolin Zhu et al.•Habitat International•2021

  • Economic transition, spatial development and urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China

    Open Access•Changyan Wu, Y D Wei et al.•Habitat International•2017

  • Land use efficiency of functional urban areas

    Open Access•Marcello Schiavina, Michele Melchiorri et al.•Habitat International•2022

  • The impact of borders and distance on knowledge spillovers — Evidence from cross-regional scientific and technological collaboration

    Open Access•Chenghui Tang, Qiu Peng et al.•Technology in Society•2022

  • Decentralization, incentives, and local tax enforcement

    Open Access•Junxue Jia, Siying Ding et al.•Journal of Urban Economics•2020

  • Dialects, cultural identity, and economic exchange

    Open Access•Oliver Falck, Stephan Heblich et al.•Journal of Urban Economics•2012

  • Competition and Local Government

    Open Access•George A Boyne•Urban Studies•1996

  • Increasing Returns and Economic Geography

    Paul Krugman•Journal of Political Economy•1991

  • Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China

    Open Access•Laurence J C Ma, Laurence J C•Political Geography•2005

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae