Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A comparative analysis of underground and bus transit networks through graph theory

Bibliographic Data

ID21248095
AuthorsLorenzo Mussone (0000-0002-2431-080X, Politecnico di Milano, corresponding author), Roberto Notari (0000-0003-4108-205X, Politecnico di Milano)
Year2021
Volume48
Issue3
Pages574-591
Publication date2021-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2399-8083 • E-ISSN: 2399-8091
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2399808319879460
OpenAlexW2980061302
LanguageEN
References cited20

The aim of this paper is to study the topographical features of a transportation infrastructure through graph theory. First, we construct a planar, connected, and simple graph for each considered infrastructure; then, we compute some normalized indices associated to the graph, namely largest eigenvalue, gap, a Betti number, and codimension. The set of indices proposed in this paper is new for this application. These indices are computed from either the adjacency matrix or the edge ideal of the graph, and so they depend on the overall topology of the graph itself; furthermore, since the normalized indices are scale-free, they allow us a more effective comparison between different transportation infrastructures. Two scenarios are considered in order to understand advantages and limits of the proposed approach: the first scenario concerns a set of underground networks of certain large cities in the world, whereas the second one concerns a set of bus transit networks of several medium-sized cities in Italy. Indices calculated for both scenarios show two types of results. First, they show that the proposed indices are able to estimate the different topologies of the considered networks: networks with the same number of vertices and of edges but not with the same graph have different indices. Second, they show that the values of the indices in the two scenarios not only belong to the same curve separately but fit well also into the same curve: the transportation networks, no matter whether underground or bus transit, seem to be controlled by similar mechanisms

Adjacency list · Adjacency matrix · Combinatorics · Graph · Graph theory · Network topology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Urban Design and Spatial Analysis · Theoretical Computer Science

  • Spatial networks

    Open Access•Marc Barthélemy•Physics Reports•2011

  • Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

    Open Access•Albert-László Barabási, Richard Albert et al.•Science•1999

  • Urban infrastructure is not a tree

    Open Access•Sybil Derrible•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2017

  • Characterizing metro networks

    Open Access•Sybil Derrible, Christopher Kennedy•Transportation•2010

  • Factor-analytic study of the connectivity of a transportation network

    Open Access•William L Garrison, Duane F Marble•Papers of the Regional Science…•1964

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae