Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Considering intermediate-status groups in intergroup hierarchies

A theory of triadic social stratification

Bibliographic Data

ID21249902
AuthorsLuca Caricati (0000-0001-5456-2621, University of Parma, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume2
Issue2
Pages58-66
Publication date2018-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Theoretical Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2475-0387 • E-ISSN: 2475-0387
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jts5.19
OpenAlexW2789497913
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited50

Social systems are organized so that some groups are at the top of the hierarchy and others are at the bottom. Psychosocial approaches to intergroup relations have typically operationalized status differences as pairs of social categories (i.e., high- vs. low-status groups). This paper discusses the role of intermediate-status groups and how the introduction of a third element in the hierarchy permits the consideration of more dynamic and complex intergroup relations. Starting from social identity theory, a theory of triadic social stratification is presented and four hypotheses are advanced. The key point is that intermediate-status groups supply members with a positive social identity through downward social comparisons with the lower-status group and hence intermediate-status group members are motivated to maintain their social position. Further hypotheses concern the fact that intermediate-status group members may act in a reactionary way especially when social stratification is unstable and members experience fear of losing their relative advantages. Contrariwise, intermediate-status group members would collectively challenge the status quo only when their relative social advantage is not in question. I consider existing work that supports these hypotheses and discuss how triadic social stratification theory may help to explain some intergroup dynamics such as the reluctance of dominated groups to collectively act in order to change the social stratification and the formation of alliances between groups for social change or hierarchy maintenance

Epistemology · Hierarchy · Operationalization · Political science · Psychosocial · Reactionary · Social group · Social identity approach · Social identity theory · Social order · Social position · Social relation · Social science · Social status · Social stratification · Sociology · Status quo · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Power and Status Dynamics · Social Psychology

  • Political orientation and system justification

    Open Access•Gianluigi Moscato, Luca Caricati et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Exploring double standards in ethnicity, migration and intercultural relations

    Open Access•Emanuele Politi, Mai Albzour et al.•International Journal of Social…•2025

  • Perceived Zero-Sum Competition Between Asian Americans and Black Americans

    Open Access•Jin X Goh, Taylor Douglas•Personality and Social Psychology…•2025

  • Stereotypes About Political Attitudes and Coalitions Among U.S. Racial Groups

    Open Access•Maureen A Craig, Artur Noguerol Rodrigo et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2022

  • Triadic intergroup relations

    Open Access•Hanna Zagefka•Journal of Theoretical Social…•2019

  • Age Discrimination of Senior Citizens in European Countries

    Open Access•Ágnes Sántha, Emese Emőke Tóth-Batizán•Societies•2024

  • Resilience in the Covid‐19 Pandemic and Beyond

    Open Access•Rui Li, Si Si Jia et al.•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2025

  • Status-based coalitions

    Open Access•Maureen A Craig, Michelle M Lee•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022

  • Let's stay close

    Open Access•Veronica Margherita Cocco, Elisa Bisagno et al.•Social Development•2022

  • A Large-Scale Test of the Reality Constraint and Ingroup Bias Accounts of Women's Support for Male Privilege

    Open Access•Chuma Kevin Owuamalam, Luca Caricati et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2023

  • Gender and National Collective Narcissism

    Open Access•Agnieszka Golec De Zavala, Oliver Keenan•Sex Roles•2024

  • A qualitative study of system justification among Italian LGB activists

    Chiara Bonetti, Sara Bassi et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2025

  • Collective Action Under Repressive Conditions

    Open Access•Arin H Ayanian, Aya Adra et al.•Social Issues and Policy Review•2025

  • We are the 99%”

    Ángel Del Fresno‐díaz, Soledad De Lemu et al.•Self and Identity•2024

  • Collective narcissism of White supremacy and minority resistance

    Open Access•Oliver Keenan, Agnieszka Golec De Zavala•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2025

  • Fighting for what’s fair

    Open Access•Finn Lannon, Jenny Roth et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2025

  • It’s not just “us” versus “them”

    John Dixon, Guy Elcheroth et al.•European Review of Social…•2020

  • Mobilizing against the disadvantaged

    Ipek Guvensoy, Sabahat Cigdem Bagci et al.•European Review of Social…•2025

  • A social identity model of system attitudes (Simsa)

    Open Access•M Rubin, Chuma Kevin Owuamalam et al.•European Review of Social…•2023

  • Contact with whom? The role of intergroup and intragroup contact in predicting support for diversity ideologies among migrants in Qatar

    Open Access•Diala R Hawi, Zacharia Bady et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Negative contact, collective action, and social change

    Open Access•John Dixon, Shelley Mckeown•Journal of Social Issues•2021

  • Economic scarcity increases racial stereotyping in beliefs and face representation

    Open Access•Michael Berkebile-Weinberg, Michael M Berkebile-Weinberg et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • National Identity and Fertility Intentions

    Open Access•Dávid Erát•Population and Development Review•2026

  • The Relationship Between Social Identification and System Justification

    Open Access•Luca Caricati, Chuma Kevin Owuamalam et al.•European Journal of Social…•2025

  • In common predicament

    Muzafer Sherif•In common predicament•1966

  • Fear of falling

    Barbara Ehrenreich•Fear of falling•1989

  • Social Identity Theory and Self‐categorization Theory

    Open Access•Matthew J Hornsey•Social and Personality Psychology…•2008

  • The Political Solidarity Model of Social Change

    Open Access•Emina Subasic, Katherine J Reynolds et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • “Last-Place Aversion”

    Ilyana Kuziemko, Ryan W Buell et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2014

  • Self and Social Identity

    Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2002

  • Contrasting explanations for status-legitimacy effects based on system justification theory and social identity theory

    Open Access•Luca Caricati, Alfonso Sollami•Journal of Theoretical Social…•2018

  • Social Dominance

    Open Access•Jim Sidanius, Felicia Pratto•Social Dominance•1999

  • Low status groups show in-group favoritism to compensate for their low status and compete for higher status

    Open Access•M Rubin, Constantina Badea et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2014

  • Responding to Membership of a Low-Status Group

    Open Access•Filip Boen, Norbert Vanbeselaere•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2000

  • Social Identity, System Justification, and Social Dominance

    Open Access•M Rubin, Miles Hewstone•Political Psychology•2004

  • Minority influence and psycho‐social identity

    Open Access•Gabriel Mugny, Stamos Papastamou et al.•European Journal of Social…•1982

  • The minimal group paradigm

    Open Access•Margaret Hartstone, Martha Augoustinos•European Journal of Social…•1995

  • Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender

    Open Access•Jim Sidanius, Shana Levin et al.•European Journal of Social…•2000

  • Social comparison and social identity

    Open Access•John Turner, John C Turner•European Journal of Social…•1975

  • Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status

    Open Access•Brian Mullen, Rupert Brown et al.•European Journal of Social…•1992

  • Explaining the nature of power

    Open Access•John Turner, John C Turner•European Journal of Social…•2005

  • Responding to tokenism

    Open Access•Stephen C Wright, D M Taylor•European Journal of Social…•1998

  • Collective Action—and Then What

    Open Access•Winnifred R Louis, Winnifred Louis•Journal of Social Issues•2009

  • Why Do People from Low‐Status Groups Support Class Systems that Disadvantage Them? A Test of Two Mainstream Explanations in Malaysia and Australia

    Open Access•Chuma Kevin Owuamalam, M Rubin et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2017

  • Non-conscious forms of system justification

    Open Access•John T Jost, Brett W Pelham et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002

  • Discrimination Constrained and Justified

    Open Access•Jolanda Jetten, Russell Spears et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2000

  • Social dominance orientation

    Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994

  • A Decade of System Justification Theory

    Open Access•John T Jost, Mahzarin R Banaji et al.•Political Psychology•2004

  • Ethnic Identity, Legitimizing Ideologies, and Social Status

    Open Access•Shana Levin, Jim Sidanius et al.•Political Psychology•1998

  • Strategies to cope with negative social identity

    Amélie Mummendey, Thomas Kessler et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies

    Naomi Ellemers, Henk Wilke et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group

    Stephen C Wright, D M Taylor et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status–legitimacy hypothesis

    Mark J Brandt•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • Politicized collective identity

    Bernd Simon, Bert Klandermans•American Psychologist•2001

  • Intergroup Bias

    Miles Hewstone, M Rubin et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2002

  • Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking

    Open Access•Susan T Fiske, Xu Juan et al.•Journal of Social Issues•1999

  • Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system

    Open Access•John T Jost, Brett W Pelham et al.•European Journal of Social…•2002

  • Status differences and in-group bias

    B Ann Bettencourt, Kelly Charlton et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2001

  • Proud but isolated? Effects of in-group favouritism and acculturation preferences on inter-ethnic attitudes and contact between German, Turkish and resettler adolescents

    Joachim Brüß•New Community•2005

  • Disgusted Subjects

    Open Access•Stephanie Lawler•The Sociological Review•2005

  • The Development of System Justification in the Developing World

    Open Access•P J Henry, Patrick Henry et al.•Social Justice Research•2006

Unique citing works24
Citations per year3,43
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae