Considering intermediate-status groups in intergroup hierarchies
A theory of triadic social stratification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21249902 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luca Caricati (0000-0001-5456-2621, University of Parma, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 58-66 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2475-0387 • E-ISSN: 2475-0387 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/jts5.19 |
| OpenAlex | W2789497913 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 50 |
Social systems are organized so that some groups are at the top of the hierarchy and others are at the bottom. Psychosocial approaches to intergroup relations have typically operationalized status differences as pairs of social categories (i.e., high- vs. low-status groups). This paper discusses the role of intermediate-status groups and how the introduction of a third element in the hierarchy permits the consideration of more dynamic and complex intergroup relations. Starting from social identity theory, a theory of triadic social stratification is presented and four hypotheses are advanced. The key point is that intermediate-status groups supply members with a positive social identity through downward social comparisons with the lower-status group and hence intermediate-status group members are motivated to maintain their social position. Further hypotheses concern the fact that intermediate-status group members may act in a reactionary way especially when social stratification is unstable and members experience fear of losing their relative advantages. Contrariwise, intermediate-status group members would collectively challenge the status quo only when their relative social advantage is not in question. I consider existing work that supports these hypotheses and discuss how triadic social stratification theory may help to explain some intergroup dynamics such as the reluctance of dominated groups to collectively act in order to change the social stratification and the formation of alliances between groups for social change or hierarchy maintenance
Epistemology · Hierarchy · Operationalization · Political science · Psychosocial · Reactionary · Social group · Social identity approach · Social identity theory · Social order · Social position · Social relation · Social science · Social status · Social stratification · Sociology · Status quo · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Power and Status Dynamics · Social Psychology
Political orientation and system justification
Exploring double standards in ethnicity, migration and intercultural relations
Perceived Zero-Sum Competition Between Asian Americans and Black Americans
Stereotypes About Political Attitudes and Coalitions Among U.S. Racial Groups
Triadic intergroup relations
Age Discrimination of Senior Citizens in European Countries
Resilience in the Covid‐19 Pandemic and Beyond
Status-based coalitions
Let's stay close
A Large-Scale Test of the Reality Constraint and Ingroup Bias Accounts of Women's Support for Male Privilege
Gender and National Collective Narcissism
A qualitative study of system justification among Italian LGB activists
Collective Action Under Repressive Conditions
We are the 99%”
Collective narcissism of White supremacy and minority resistance
Fighting for what’s fair
It’s not just “us” versus “them”
Mobilizing against the disadvantaged
A social identity model of system attitudes (Simsa)
Contact with whom? The role of intergroup and intragroup contact in predicting support for diversity ideologies among migrants in Qatar
Negative contact, collective action, and social change
Economic scarcity increases racial stereotyping in beliefs and face representation
National Identity and Fertility Intentions
The Relationship Between Social Identification and System Justification
In common predicament
Fear of falling
Social Identity Theory and Self‐categorization Theory
The Political Solidarity Model of Social Change
“Last-Place Aversion”
Self and Social Identity
Contrasting explanations for status-legitimacy effects based on system justification theory and social identity theory
Social Dominance
Low status groups show in-group favoritism to compensate for their low status and compete for higher status
Responding to Membership of a Low-Status Group
Social Identity, System Justification, and Social Dominance
Minority influence and psycho‐social identity
The minimal group paradigm
Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender
Social comparison and social identity
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status
Explaining the nature of power
Responding to tokenism
Collective Action—and Then What
Why Do People from Low‐Status Groups Support Class Systems that Disadvantage Them? A Test of Two Mainstream Explanations in Malaysia and Australia
Non-conscious forms of system justification
Discrimination Constrained and Justified
Social dominance orientation
A Decade of System Justification Theory
Ethnic Identity, Legitimizing Ideologies, and Social Status
Strategies to cope with negative social identity
Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies
Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group
Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status–legitimacy hypothesis
Politicized collective identity
Intergroup Bias
Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking
Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system
Status differences and in-group bias
Proud but isolated? Effects of in-group favouritism and acculturation preferences on inter-ethnic attitudes and contact between German, Turkish and resettler adolescents
Disgusted Subjects
The Development of System Justification in the Developing World
| Unique citing works | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |