Literary Center of Constructivists on Its Way to the Rapp (From the History of Literary Life at the Turn of the 1920s — 1930s)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21250350 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Natalia V Kornienko (0000-0003-2231-1830, Russian Academy of Sciences), Ruslan E Klementiev (0000-0002-2861-6400, Russian Academy of Sciences) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 304-321 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studia Litterarum (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2500-4247 • E-ISSN: 2541-8564 |
| Publisher | A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.22455/2500-4247-2021-6-3-304-321 |
| OpenAlex | W3200270453 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
The article examines one of the episodes of the literary struggle of the late 1920s — early 1930s — the history of the entry of the Literary Center of Constructivists (LCC) into the Russian Association of Proletarian Writers (RAPP). At the beginning of 1930, almost all literary groups and associations faced the need to define a new level of interaction with RAPP. LCC, as one of the literary groups closest to RAPP, seemed to have all the prerequisites for a successful association with the RAPP. But in reality, this did not happen. Members of RAPP are suspicious of constructivists; attacks at LCC are becoming more frequent in the press. Always considered a left-wing association, LLC is declared a petty-bourgeois group, with which, despite its disbandment, an irreconcilable struggle is required. This article bears upon not only the periodicals of 1930 but also and mainly upon the hitherto unstudied transcripts and other archival documents of RAPP. New archival materials reveal internal processes of the literary struggle at the turn of the decade, and make it possible to demonstrate how, even after the acceptance of the Constructivists by RAPP, the former continue to be perceived as a hostile group whose past was to always blame them
Art · Blame · Literature · Political science · Politics · Proletariat · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · Law · Library Science and Information · Psychology · Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|