Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nikolay Soloviev as a Criticm of Chernyshevsky’s Aesthetic Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID21250735
AuthorsViktor I Shcherbakov (0000-0003-4769-6634, Russian Academy of Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume8
Issue1
Pages46-63
Publication date2023-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudia Litterarum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2500-4247 • E-ISSN: 2541-8564
PublisherA. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-1-46-63
OpenAlexW4327518521
LanguageEN

Dissertation of Nikolay Chernyshevsky “The Aesthetic Relationship of Art to Reality” (1855) is one of the most controversial works in the history of humanitarian sciences. Even during the author’s life, it was estimated ambiguous (and also sharply negative). Among the early responses to this work, a prominent place is occupied by the critical cycle of Nikolay Ivanovich Solovyov (1831–1874) “The Art Issue” (1865). The critic analyzes Chernyshevsky’s concepts of the beautiful, the sublime, the tragic and comes to the conclusion that his definitions are untenable. Solovyov also finds little solidity in Chernyshevsky’s judgments about certain kinds of art, noting this tendency to emphasize the imperfection of artistic works in comparison with nature. Solovyov’s main conclusions are as follows: Chernyshevsky’s “theory of reproduction” is an attempt to revive the theory of imitation of nature, while the appearance of novelty is created by pointing to “real direction of thoughts” of the author Chernyshevsky very vaguely characterizes the beautiful; grossly simplifies the tasks of art (“reproduction”); discredits the creative imagination and the artist’s craving for the ideal; seeks to lower the high status of art in the range of human interests. Solovyov’s analysis is distinguished by consistency, respect for the convictions of his opponent, as well as his own view of the issues raised by Chernyshevsky. In “The Art Issue” and other articles Solovyov defended his belief that Chernyshevsky’s “theory of reproduction” was the prototype of the utilitarian and nihilistic views on art in journalism of the 1860s. This article presents for the first time a detailed analysis of Nikolay Solovyov’ s views on art in comparison with Chernyshevsky’s aesthetic theory

Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Art world · Epistemology · Imitation · Modern art · Performance art · Reproduction · Sublime · Work of art · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication · Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry · Social Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae