Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“Non-rhetorical” musical-rhetorical figures in the treatises of the Baroque era

Bibliographic Data

ID21254168
AuthorsAnastasiya A Maltseva (0000-0001-9265-1975, Magnitogorsk State Conservatory named after M I Glinka, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume10
Issue1
Pages011-032
Publication date2026-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Musicology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2587-9731 • E-ISSN: 2587-9731
PublisherThe Gnesins Russian Academy of Music (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.56620/2587-9731-2026-1-011-032
OpenAlexW7160266646
LanguageEN

The article explores a seemingly non-obvious yet significant component of musical-rhetorical figures, a phenomenon widely discussed in musicology. This component is defined by the compositional and technical aspects of the figures rather than their intonational-semantic or musical-symbolic qualities. The study focuses on the so-called principal figures (figuræ principales / figuræ fundamentales) found in treatises of the 17th and the first half of the 18th centuries, specifically in the classifications of Johannes Nucius, Joachim Thuringus, Athanasius Kircher, Tomáš Baltazar Janovka (Janowka), Christoph Bernhard, Johann Gottfried Walther, and their successor Johann Adolf Scheibe. By examining two chronologically disparate lists — the earliest and latest, found in the works of Nucius (Musices poeticæ sive de compositione cantus, Neisse, 1613) and Scheibe (Critischer Musicus, Leipzig, 1745) — the author analyzes figures that define the rules for using dissonances on weak and strong beats. In these theoretical descriptions, the figures do not align with the criteria typically used in modern musicology to characterize musical-rhetorical figures (such as deviations from the stile antico norms, enhancement of expressive delivery, or the representation of affects and ideas). Instead, the figures commissura directa and commissura cadens in Nucius’s explanation, as well as transitus, ligatura, and syncopatio in Scheibe’s description, represent the codification of normative, conventional techniques well-known to musicians. Johann Adolf Scheibe labels these techniques as “figures,” he subsequently employs the term “rule” (Compositionsregeln, harmonische Regeln) when detailing their characteristics. The coexistence of components oriented toward both old and new norms demonstrates the heterogeneous nature of these lists. This circumstance highlights significant contradictions between authentic historical knowledge and the prevalent interpretation of figures in modern musical analysis, while also suggesting new directions for researching the genesis of musical figures — analogous to rhetorical ones — within Baroque treatises. Keywords: musical-rhetorical figures, musical rhetoric, German music theory, history of music theory, doctrine of composition, music treatises, German Baroque music, rules of counterpoint, Johannes Nucius, Musices poeticæ sive de compositione cantus, Johann Adolf Scheibe, Critischer Musicus

Baroque · Component (thermodynamics) · Phenomenon · Representation (politics) · Successor cardinal · Term (time) · Bach Studies and Logistics Development · Central European and Russian historical studies · Musicology and Musical Analysis

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae