Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Polarization as Disagreement Failure

Bibliographic Data

ID21255215
AuthorsPhilip T Neisser (State University of New York at Potsdam, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume2
Issue1
Publication date2006-08-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Deliberative Democracy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2634-0488 • E-ISSN: 2634-0488
PublisherUniversity of Westminster Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.16997/jdd.44
OpenAlexW44777004
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

A few events in recent American history are analyzed as “disagreement failures,” while others are described as exemplifying “disagreement success.” These terms are defined in order to support the conclusion that deliberative democracy requires both the celebration of disagreement and the crossing of multiple borders through dialogue. Such a “democracy of conversation” more specifically requires a culture that explicitly celebrates disagreement as an activity, meaning that it treats actual engagement in disagreement as a part of a life well-lived, and that it therefore routinely pushes for the inclusion of as many “sides” as possible in public talk. Supported in this way, cross-border, public conversation would be inherently democratic, community-building, and anti-totalitarian. Held regularly, such talk would help participants to see issues from multiple points of view, and would do so without asking them to give in to the non-thinking of mere tolerance. People who take part in such conversations would be more likely to face up to difficult issues politicians often avoid, and politicians would both be pushed and enabled to do better. In addition, such disagreement practice would cultivate respect for humanity, as participants observe themselves and others making sense, being civil, and in general doing a good job under presssure

Conversation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Epistemology · Humanity · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Theorizing Communication Orientations of Privilege

    Katie Margavio Striley, Shannon L Lawson et al.•Journal of International and…•2014

  • Enhancing participatory conflict transformation in Sierra Leone

    Caterina Becorpi•African Studies•2018

  • The shades of (un)productive disagreement

    Open Access•Asaf Salman, Yifat Ben-David Kolikant•Educational Research Review•2026

  • Why Deliberative Democracy?

    Amy Gutmann, D F Thompson et al.•Why Deliberative Democracy?•2004

  • Political Philosophy and the Idea of a Social Science

    Peter Lassman, George Klosko•The Oxford handbook of the…•2011

  • Inclusion and Democracy

    Iris Marion Young•Readings in Planning Theory•2015

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae