Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Just graze it! Biodiversity, nectar and forage resources in cultural landscapes grazed by different livestock species

Bibliographic Data

ID21255722
AuthorsMorgane Demeaux (0000-0001-6822-034X, University of Bergen, corresponding author), Morgane Kerdoncuff (0000-0003-2223-1857, University of Bergen), Amy E Eycott (0000-0002-8609-1091, Nord University), Inger Måren (0000-0002-3964-9144, University of Bergen)
Year2024
Volume20
Issue1
Publication date2024-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEcosystems and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2639-5908 • E-ISSN: 2639-5916
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/26395916.2024.2311176
OpenAlexW4392001091
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited75

The Nordhordland UNESCO Biosphere Reserve encompasses a heterogeneous landscape which provides numerous ecosystem services. Semi-natural grasslands provide forage for traditionally managed livestock and are important sources of nectar and pollen for pollinators. However, these services are not evenly distributed due to different biotic and abiotic constraints of the fjord landscape, which stretches from flat coastal areas to steep hills and mountains inland. We studied how geographic location and grazing livestock type affect the plant species richness, plant functional group composition, nectar and forage resources of these grasslands. We recorded plant species percentage cover in 30 fields in the Nordhordland Biosphere Reserve grazed by sheep, goats or cattle, and from these data we calculated indicator values for forage and nectar resource using species index values from existing trait databases. Sites grazed by cattle had significantly different plant functional group compositions than sites grazed by sheep or goats, independent of geographical location. Forage resource indicator values were lower at coastal sites grazed by sheep. We found a weak but significant positive correlation between nectar resource indicator value and plant species richness, as well as between nectar and forage resource indicator values. Type of livestock and geographical location are not the only factors influencing provisioning services in semi-natural grasslands. Nonetheless, traditional grazing maintains ecosystem service delivery even in low-productive coastal areas. Forage resource, nectar provision and plant species richness appear to be bundled, providing clear guidance for managing ecosystem services in Nordhordland UNESCO Biosphere Reserve’s valuable cultural landscapes

Agroforestry · Agronomy · Biodiversity · Biology · Forage · Geography · Grassland · Grazing · Livestock · Nectar · Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies · Plant and animal studies · Plant Parasitism and Resistance · Ecology · Forestry

  • Biodiversity heritage and transformation of beekeeping

    Open Access•Hale Özgit, Erkay Özgör et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Ggplot2

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham•Ggplot2•2016

  • Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe–A review

    Open Access•Klaus Henle, Didier Alard et al.•Agriculture, Ecosystems &…•2008

  • Model Selection and Multimodel Inference

    Open Access•Fred S Guthery, Kenneth P Burnham et al.•Journal of Wildlife Management•2003

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Priority maps for pollinator habitat enhancement schemes in semi-natural grasslands

    Open Access•Markus A K Sydenham, Katrine Eldegard et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • Ceased grazing management changes the ecosystem services of semi-natural grasslands

    Open Access•Line Johansen, Simon Taugourdeau et al.•Ecosystems and People•2019

  • Participatory mapping reveals biocultural and nature values in the shared landscape of a Nordic Unesco Biosphere Reserve

    Open Access•Jarrod Cusens, Alicia M D Barraclough et al.•People and Nature•2022

  • Global knowledge–action networks at the frontlines of sustainability

    Open Access•Alicia Donnellan Barraclough, Maureen G Reed et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Hesitant hunters

    Kari Loe Hjelle, Anne Karin Hufthammer et al.•Environmental Archaeology•2006

  • Historical trade-offs of livestock’s environmental impacts

    Open Access•Keith F Davis, Kailiang Yu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Land-Tenure and Landscape Change in Fishing Communities on the Outer Coast of Central Norway, c. 1880 to the Present

    Michael Jones, Michael E Jones•Geografiska Annaler Series B…•1988

  • Cultural landscape development on a west–east gradient in western Norway – potential of the Landscape Reconstruction Algorithm (LRA)

    Open Access•Ingvild Kristine Mehl, Anette Overland et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2015

  • Adaptive biodiversity management of semi-natural hay meadows

    Open Access•Sølvi Wehn, Rob J F Burton et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Farmland abandonment in Europe

    Open Access•Jean-Michel Terres, Jean‐Michel Terres et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Integration matters

    Open Access•Jarrod Cusens, Alicia Donnellan Barraclough et al.•AMBIO•2023

  • Early farming in hordaland, western Norway. Problems and approaches in archaeology and pollen analysis

    Egil Bakka, Peter Emil Kaland•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1971

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae