Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A comparison of different methods of identifying publications related to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Case study of SDG 13—Climate Action

Bibliographic Data

ID21255738
AuthorsPhilip J Purnell (0000-0003-3146-2737, Leiden University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume3
Issue4
Pages976-1002
Publication date2022-12-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuantitative Science Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2641-3337 • E-ISSN: 2641-3337
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/qss_a_00215
OpenAlexW4300773433
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited32

As sustainability becomes an increasing priority throughout global society, academic and research institutions are assessed on their contribution to relevant research publications. This study compares four methods of identifying research publications related to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13—Climate Action (SDG 13). The four methods (Elsevier, STRINGS, SIRIS, and Dimensions) have each developed search strings with the help of subject matter experts, which are then enhanced through distinct methods to produce a final set of publications. Our analysis showed that the methods produced comparable quantities of publications but with little overlap between them. We visualized some difference in topic focus between the methods and drew links with the search strategies used. Differences between publications retrieved are likely to come from subjective interpretation of the goals, keyword selection, operationalizing search strategies, AI enhancements, and selection of bibliographic database. Each of the elements warrants deeper investigation to understand their role in identifying SDG-related research. Before choosing any method to assess the research contribution to SDGs, end users of SDG data should carefully consider their interpretation of the goal and determine which of the available methods produces the closest data set. Meanwhile, data providers might customize their methods for varying interpretations of the SDGs

Data science · Library science · Management science · Political science · Subject matter · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Engineering · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Artificial Intelligence

  • Plant biostimulants and their potential role in achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Patrick Quille, Joanna Kacprzyk et al.•PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET•2026

  • How to use assignments of United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) to scientific papers in research evaluation? The proposal of a gold standard combining assignments from different data providers

    Open Access•Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Towards multiple ontologies in science mapping. A tribute to Loet Leydesdorff

    Open Access•Ismael Ràfols•Scientometrics•2025

  • Geodiversity of research

    Open Access•Philip J Purnell•Scientometrics•2024

  • Mapping national and institutional research that targets Sustainable Development Goals using OpenAlex data

    Open Access•Robin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann•Scientometrics•2026

  • Evaluating approaches to identifying research supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Yury Kashnitsky, Guillaume Roberge et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • Recategorising research

    Open Access•Simon J Porter, Lezan Hawizy et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Can Sustainable Development Goal Classification Tools Be Trusted? Analysing the Spanish National Research Council Output on Gender Equality

    Open Access•Núria Bautista‐Puig, Daniela De Filippo et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Applying AI for social good

    Open Access•David S Steingard, David Steingard et al.•AI & Society•2023

  • Using novel data and ensemble models to improve automated labeling of Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Dirk U Wulff, Dominik S Meier et al.•Sustainability Science•2024

  • Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus

    Open Access•Eric Archambault, David Campbell et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2009

  • A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science

    Open Access•Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck•Journal of the Association for…•2012

  • Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation

    Open Access•Eugene Garfield•Science•1972

  • An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

    Open Access•J E Hirsch•Proceedings of the National…•2005

  • Dimensions

    Open Access•Christian Herzog, Daniel W Hook et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Mapping scholarly publications related to the Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Caroline S Armitage, Marta Lorenz et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources

    Open Access•Martijn Visser, Nees Jan van Eck et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2021

  • Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

    Open Access•Jeroen Baas, Michiel Schotten et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Comparison of bibliographic data sources

    Open Access•Chun-Kai Huang, Cameron Neylon et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Language differences in qualitative research

    Open Access•Fenna van Nes, Tineke Abma et al.•European Journal of Ageing•2010

Unique citing works10
Citations per year3.33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae