Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Operationalizing open and restricted-access data—Formulating verifiable criteria for the openness of data sets mentioned in biomedical research articles

Bibliographic Data

ID21255782
AuthorsEvgeny Bobrov (0000-0002-2368-464X, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Nico Riedel (0000-0002-3808-1163, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Miriam Kip (0000-0003-4320-9261, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin)
Year2024
Volume5
Issue2
Pages383-407
Publication date2024-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuantitative Science Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2641-3337 • E-ISSN: 2641-3337
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/qss_a_00301
OpenAlexW4393148796
LanguageEN
References cited54

Increasing the availability of research data sets is a goal of many stakeholders in science, and monitoring related practices requires definitions of the entity in question. There are several, largely overlapping, definitions for open data. However, they have so far not been translated into operationalizations that would allow us to detect, in a structured and reproducible way, whether, for a specific research article, the underlying data have been shared. Here, we propose a detailed set of criteria to enable such assessments, focusing on biomedical research. We have used these criteria to distribute performance-oriented funding at a large university hospital and to monitor data sharing practices in a dashboard. In addition to fully open data, we include separate criteria for data sets with restricted access, which we also reward. The criteria are partly inspired by the FAIR principles, particularly findability and accessibility, but do not map onto individual principles. The criteria attribute open data status in a binary fashion, both to individual data sets and, ultimately, articles with which they were shared. The criteria allow a verifiable assessment, based on automated and manual screening steps, which we have implemented and validated, as described elsewhere. Here, we focus conceptually on assessing the presence of shared data

Dashboard · Data mining · Data science · Data sharing · Information retrieval · Linked Data · Open data · Openness to experience · Operationalization · Semantic Web · Verifiable secret sharing · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Research Data Management Practices · Scientific Computing and Data Management · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Data Sharing by Scientists

    Open Access•Carol Tenopir, Suzanne Allard et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  • The Fair Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

    Open Access•Mark D Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier et al.•Scientific Data•2016

  • Tracing data

    Open Access•Kathleen Gregory, Anton Boudreau Ninkov et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • The quantification of open scholarship—a mapping review

    Open Access•Verena Weimer, Tamara Heck et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper

    Open Access•Lutz Bornmann, Raf Guns et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2021

  • Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing

    Andrea E Abele-Brehm, Mario Gollwitzer et al.•Social Psychology•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae