Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comprehensive mapping of local and diaspora scientists

A database and analysis of 63,951 Greek scientists

Bibliographic Data

ID21255929
AuthorsJohn P A Ioannidis (0000-0003-3118-6859, Protein Metrics (United States)), Chara Koutsioumpa (0000-0002-0143-4375, Harvard University), Angeliki Vakka (0000-0003-2332-4799, University of Patras), Georgios Agoranos (0000-0002-6088-6283, Hellenic Center of Mental Health and Research (EKEPSYE), Athens, Greece), Chrysanthi Mantsiou (0000-0002-1439-7374, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Maria Kyriaki Drekolia (0000-0003-4204-2391, Goethe University Frankfurt), Nikos Avramidis (0000-0001-5638-3176, Roslin Institute), Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis (0000-0002-1918-8918, Stanford University), Konstantinos Drosatos (0000-0003-0903-834X, Temple University), Jeroen Baas (0000-0001-8005-4153, RELX Group (Netherlands))
Year2021
Volume2
Issue2
Pages733-752
Publication date2021-07-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuantitative Science Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2641-3337 • E-ISSN: 2641-3337
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/qss_a_00136
OpenAlexW3158590911
LanguageEN
References cited22

Research policy and planning for a given country may benefit from reliable data on both its scientific workforce as well as the diaspora of scientists for countries with a substantial brain drain. Here we use a systematic approach using Scopus to generate a comprehensive country-level database of all scientists in Greece. Moreover, we expand that database to include also Greek diaspora scientists. The database that we have compiled includes 63,951 scientists who have published at least five papers indexed in Scopus. Of those, 35,116 have an affiliation in Greece. We validate the sensitivity and specificity of the database against different control sets of scientists. We also analyze the scientific disciplines of these scientists according to the Science Metrix classification (174 subfield disciplines) and provide detailed data on each of the 63,951 scientists using multiple citation indicators and a composite thereof. These analyses demonstrate differential concentrations in specific subfields for the local versus the diaspora cohorts, as well as an advantage of the diaspora cohort in terms of citation indicators, especially among top-impact researchers. The approach that we have taken can also be applied to map the scientific workforce of other countries and nations for evaluation, planning, and policy purposes

Citation · Data science · Database · Diaspora · Library science · MEDLINE · Political science · Scopus · Workforce · Computer Science · Global Health Workforce Issues · Higher Education Governance and Development · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Law

  • Bias against novelty in science

    Open Access•Jian Wang, Reinhilde Veugelers et al.•Research Policy•2017

  • Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review

    Sarah De Rijcke, Paul Wouters et al.•Research Evaluation•2016

  • A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

    Open Access•Ludo Waltman•Journal of Informetrics•2016

  • A brain gain with a brain drain

    Open Access•Oded Stark, Christian Helmenstein et al.•Economics Letters•1997

  • Bibliometrics

    Open Access•Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters et al.•Nature•2015

  • Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies

    Open Access•Jeroen Baas, Michiel Schotten et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae