Interlocking Directorates, Government Capital, and CSR Disclosure
Networked Drivers in Chinese Firms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21259868 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chao Liu (0000-0001-9257-4519, Beijing Technology and Business University), Yuejie Pan (Beijing Union University, corresponding author), Li Zhu (0000-0003-0179-6496, Peking University), Dehuai Jiang (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Yi Man (0000-0002-3745-9128, New York University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2694-6416 • E-ISSN: 2694-6424 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/beer.70061 |
| OpenAlex | W4416966157 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 130 |
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a key basis for organizational legitimacy and competitive advantage, yet the meso‐level mechanisms by which CSR disclosure practices diffuse through interconnected corporate networks remain poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear how CSR influence cascades across both direct and indirect ties in interlocking directorate networks and how political embeddedness moderates this process in emerging economy contexts such as China. Using data from 2941 firm‐year observations of 722 publicly listed Chinese firms between 2008 and 2017, we employ a network approach grounded in social network theory and upper echelons theory to investigate how interlocking directorates facilitate CSR diffusion and how political embeddedness shapes this dynamic. Our results reveal that CSR practices are influenced not only by direct ties within interlocking directorates but also propagate through indirect connections, with influence extending up to three degrees of separation in the network. This study makes three distinct contributions: (1) to academic literature, we empirically extend CSR and upper echelons theory by integrating the “three degrees of influence” rule into the corporate context; (2) to managers, we identify interlocking directorates as cost‐effective channels for learning and adopting CSR practices; and (3) to policymakers, we provide actionable insights for designing network‐based interventions to accelerate diffusion. By highlighting the roles of government‐related social capital and network structures, our research offers novel theoretical foundations and practical implications for both practitioners and regulators seeking to promote CSR adoption and diffusion across interlocking‐directorate networks
Corporate social responsibility · Embeddedness · Interlocking · Legitimacy · Resource dependence theory · Social capital · Social network analysis · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem
Regression Diagnostics
Whose Call to Answer
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Organizational responses to environmental demands
Do Political Connections Buffer Firms from or Bind Firms to the Government? A Study of Corporate Charitable Donations of Chinese Firms
Corporate responsibility and financial performance
What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility
How corporate social responsibility is defined
Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?
Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility
“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.
The political economy of CSR in Western Europe
Political connection and CSR
Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer
The Animal Rights Crusade
Alone in the crowd
Corporate Social Responsibility Theories
What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates
Toward a Role-Theoretic Conception of Embeddedness
| Highly cited | No |
|---|