Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Most significant changes from women’s economic empowerment and pathways from Ugandan women in the agro-value chain

Bibliographic Data

ID21262868
AuthorsJapheth Kwiringira (0000-0002-3323-6613, Kyambogo University, corresponding author), Japheth Nkiriyehe Kwiringira, Grace Esther Amuge (0009-0005-6584-7012, Kyambogo University), David Okimait (0000-0001-9775-4543, Kyambogo University), Elizabeth W Perry (0000-0002-8912-7731, Georgia State University), Deborah Nakalyowa Luggya (Kyambogo University), Alone Isabirye (0000-0003-3871-7632, Kyambogo University), Isabirye Alone, Jude Otim (0000-0003-0695-5636, Kyambogo University), Sumani Ganafa (Kyambogo University), Joseph Rujumba (0000-0002-9485-8790, Makerere University), Henry Zakumumpa (0000-0002-8169-1151, Makerere University), James Mugisha (0000-0003-2084-8693, Kyambogo University)
Year2025
Volume3
Issue1
Publication date2025-11-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscover Global Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2731-9687 • E-ISSN: 2731-9687
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s44282-025-00301-6
OpenAlexW4416011426
LanguageEN
References cited32

Traditional evaluation models often rely on predefined indicators set by program designers, limiting the ability to capture emerging and lived outcomes. This study examines the impact of Women’s Economic Empowerment from beneficiaries’ perspectives using the Most Significant Change approach. A qualitative exploratory study was conducted in Kampala and Wakiso, Uganda, utilizing focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and in-depth interviews among adult women who had waned off WEE support, supplemented by a literature review. Thematic analysis identified (5) significant domains of change at the waning of women’s economic empowerment support, including increased responsibility, community respect, improved mental health, stronger family relations, and enhanced confidence and agency. Challenges such as polygamous relationships, competitive dynamics, and the effects of COVID-19 hindered women’s empowerment outcomes. Pathways to significant change were: goal setting, peer and family support, resilience, and self-recognition of progress. Findings suggest that women’s empowerment should not focus solely on economic empowerment but must also address social and political dimensions of power, participation and inclusion. Women valued respect over power. Sustainable empowerment requires the active inclusion of men to mitigate adversarial gender dynamics. These findings reflect the need for inclusive development approaches to attain lasting societal progress

Empowerment · Exploratory research · Focus group · Politics · Qualitative research · Thematic analysis · Women's empowerment · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Microfinance and Financial Inclusion

  • The art and science of clinical knowledge

    Open Access•Kirsti Malterud•The Lancet•2001

  • Development as Capability Expansion

    Amartya Sen•Human Development and the…•1990

  • Kinship, Patriarchal Structure and Women’s Bargaining with Patriarchy in Rural Sindh, Pakistan

    Open Access•Nadia Agha, Nadia H Agha•Kinship, Patriarchal Structure…•2021

  • When backstage becomes frontstage? A critical ethnographic study of Norwegian recovery colleges

    Open Access•Therese Ersvær Sjursæther, Christine Øye et al.•SSM - Mental Health•2024

  • The Social System

    Talcott Parsons•Social System•2013

  • Exploring economic empowerment and gender issues in Lesotho’s Child Grants Programme

    Open Access•Elodie Besnier, Thandie Hlabana et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2024

  • Thinking about the Coding Process in Qualitative Data Analysis

    Open Access•Victoria Elliott•Qualitative Report•2018

  • A Ladder of Empowerment

    Open Access•Elizabeth M Rocha•Journal of Planning Education and…•1997

  • Social inequality and access to social capital in microfinance interventions

    Open Access•Mudit Kumar Singh, Jaemin Lee•International Journal of…•2020

  • Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions

    Edison J Trickett, Sarah Beehler et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Goffman on Gender, Sexism, and Feminism

    Open Access•Mary Jo Deegan•Symbolic Interaction•2014

  • A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

    Open Access•Donald R Thomas, David R Thomas•American Journal of Evaluation•2006

  • Most Significant Change Approach

    Open Access•Mohan K Sharma, Shanti P Khanal et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Muhammad Naeem, Wilson Ozuem et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Doing a Hermeneutic Phenomenology Research Underpinned by Gadamer's Philosophy

    Open Access•Rasha Alsaigh, Imelda Coyne•International Journal of…•2021

  • Street Phenomenology

    Open Access•Margarethe Kusenbach•Ethnography•2003

  • Understanding

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Theory Culture & Society•1996

  • Nonviolent youth activism and symbolic violence

    Open Access•B A Lohmeyer•Current Sociology•2023

  • Audit Culture Revisited

    C Shore, Wright et al.•Current Anthropology•2015

  • A Mixed-Method (Quantitative and Qualitative) Approach to Measure Women'S Empowerment in Agriculture

    Noshaba Aziz, Imran Khan et al.•Community Work & Family•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae