State accountability in maritime SAR operations involving smuggled migrants
Human rights challenges at sea
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21263107 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Syful Islam (0000-0002-3092-0858, Ankara University, corresponding author), Dogara Waziri Fadason (0000-0001-7994-5872, Kaduna State University), Ali Ashraf (0009-0005-9508-0078, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discover Global Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2731-9687 • E-ISSN: 2731-9687 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44282-025-00243-z |
| OpenAlex | W4413380908 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
This article investigates a specific and underexamined question in international law: to what extent are states legally accountable for their conduct during maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) operations involving smuggled migrants? While international frameworks such as UNCLOS, the SAR Convention, and the 1951 Refugee Convention impose clear obligations to rescue, prevent refoulement, and ensure humane treatment, these duties are frequently undermined by jurisdictional loopholes, ambiguous legal terms, and the strategic externalization of enforcement. Through doctrinal legal analysis and case studies from the Central Mediterranean, Bay of Bengal, and Caribbean Sea, the article demonstrates how states systematically reinterpret or evade these obligations to prioritize migration control over legal compliance. Unlike prior literature that treats SAR primarily as a humanitarian or logistical challenge, this study reframes it as a site of legal fragmentation and accountability failure. The article fills a critical gap by offering a structured legal critique of how state responsibility is diluted in practice. It proposes concrete legal and institutional reforms, such as binding definitions of “place of safety,” integrated SAR–asylum protocols, and regional disembarkation agreements. It argues that without legal clarity, enforcement mechanisms, and political will, SAR operations risk becoming a façade that masks violations of international protection norms
Accountability · Human rights · Political science · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Computer Science · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Public Administration
The European Convention of Human Rights and Migration at Sea
Captivity, Migration, and Power in Libya
A Massive Loss of Habitat
The Readmission of Asylum Seekers under International Law
Extending the Right to Life Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Asylum at Sea
Terrorism and the Non-derogability of Non-refoulement
Vulnerability and marginalisation at sea
Protection in the context of mixed migratory movements by sea
Strengthening the principle of non-refoulement
Criminalisation and Control
Offshoring the Border
The recognition of a right to be rescued at sea in international law
The failure of regional refugee protection and responsibility sharing
Even worse than the undocumented? Assessing the refugees’ integration in the labour market of Lombardy (Italy) in 2001–2014
Human Rights Obligations in Maritime Search and Rescue
Refugee Law At Sea
The Exercise of State Power Over Migrants at Sea Through Technologies of Remote Control
Sexual violence in the border zone
Malaysia and the Rohingya
Death at Sea
Coping with the Libyan migration crisis
Mediterranean racisms. Connections and complexities in the racialization of the Mediterranean region
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |