Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The effect of administration skills on Rorschach protocols

Bibliographic Data

ID21283676
AuthorsAnna María Rosso (0000-0003-4822-9798, University of Genoa, corresponding author), Andrea Camoirano (0000-0003-0576-3915)
Year2022
Volume227
Pages103607
Publication date2022-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueActa Psychologica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103607
PMID35524993
OpenAlexW4229044359
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited23

Although the Rorschach is the most widely studied and used non self-report measure to assess personality, no empirical studies have been carried out to investigate what level of expertise is needed to properly collect valid Rorschach protocols. The aim of the current study was to explore, using a within-subject design, the effect of training on proficiency in administering the Rorschach, specifically a) what kind of errors are associated with different levels of training, and b) what level of expertise guarantees a sufficiently effective Rorschach administration. The second (T1), the fifth (T2) and the tenth (T3) Rorschach protocols collected by 50 licensed psychologists attending a Rorschach training course were examined to explore what kind of mistakes were made at the different stages of training. In the Response phase, examiners collected more simplistic protocols and made more errors at T1, while they showed satisfactory proficiency at T2. Regarding the Inquiry Phase, the most relevant finding was that at T1 examiners made both errors of omission and commission, while at T2 they no longer made errors of omission but they did make more errors of commission, likely as a temporary effect of the training. At T3 a sufficiently effective Rorschach administration was carried out. Findings suggest that a 100-h Rorschach training course and 10 administrations as practicum, each followed by individual feedback and group discussion, might be sufficient to guarantee sufficiently effective Rorschach administration skills

Mathematics education · Medical education · Personality · Practicum · Rorschach test · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Medical and Biological Sciences · Medicine · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology · Social Psychology · Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

  • Non-self-report measures to assess personality

    Open Access•Kostas A Papageorgiou, Tayler E Truhan et al.•Acta Psychologica•2023

  • New Versions of the MMPI and Rorschach

    Alicia W Villanueva van den Hurk, 俞大为 俞大为 et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•2024

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

    Domenic V Cicchetti•Psychological Assessment•1994

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae