Paediatric patient experience during hospitalisation stays
Developing paediatric PREMS questionnaires through a collaborative Delphi study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21283696 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabina De Rosis (Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, corresponding author), Veronica Spataro (0000-0003-3375-6341, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna), Jan A Hazelzet (0000-0002-9414-5539, Erasmus MC), Elisa Peruzzo (0009-0001-3994-2527, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna), Manila Bonciani (0000-0002-1594-4819, Meyer Children's Hospital) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 267 |
| Pages | 106821 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Psychologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106821 |
| PMID | 42107203 |
| OpenAlex | W7160718316 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
Children and adolescents may experience vulnerability when accessing healthcare services. Despite patient-centered care is a core principle of healthcare, a notable gap remains in systematically integrating their perspectives into healthcare management. Part of the VoiCES European project, this study explored the construct of paediatric patient experience, and participatorily developed a standardised set of tools for collecting children and adolescents' feedback, with a particular focus on experiences during hospitalisation. A collaborative, consensus-building process engaged children, adolescents, families, experts, and healthcare professionals in several European countries. The study combined a Delphi study with in-depth interviews to paediatric patients across four European children's hospitals. Stakeholder involvement was pivotal in refining the dimensions, sub-domains, and questionnaire items of paediatric experience with hospital stay. Age-appropriate, multilingual questionnaires were developed for collecting Paediatric Patient Reported Experience Measures (Paediatric PREMs) from hospitalized children and their caregivers, separately. The tools cover various dimensions of the hospital experience according to respondent group. For children aged 8–14 years, visual elements were included to support comprehension and engagement. This study highlights the importance of tailoring participation and evaluation tools to different age groups. The Paediatric PREMs offer valuable resources for healthcare managers, providers, and patient experience experts seeking to incorporate young patients' perspectives into quality improvement and healthcare management processes. They also contribute to the development of a European Observatory on paediatric hospital experiences. • Reviews highlight low child involvement in paediatric healthcare service evaluation. • PREMs were co-developed via a multi-stakeholder participatory design. • Young people were involved via interviews and Delphi process reaching an expert consensus. • Cognitive testing improved wording and age-appropriate formats. • PREMs enable cross-country comparability in paediatric care
Delphi · Delphi method · Focus group · Health care · MEDLINE · Patient experience · Respondent · Stakeholder · Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research
The science of stakeholder engagement in research
An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis
Engaging experts by experience as co-producers
Measuring the quality of care in small countries
Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of a patient‐reported experience measure for children
Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Family-Centered Care
Behavioural and social sciences to enhance the efficacy of health promotion interventions
Identifying core measures to be used in mental health research with care experienced young people
Inspiring Conversations’
What's in a Name
Using thematic analysis in psychology
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |