Increased levels of autistic traits are associated with atypical moral judgments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21284026 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Evan Clarkson (0000-0002-2306-6614, Indiana University Bloomington, corresponding author), John D Jasper (University of Toledo), Jason P Rose (0000-0002-4250-2530, University of Toledo), Gary J Gaeth (0000-0001-9514-8531, University of Iowa), Irwin P Levin (University of Iowa) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 235 |
| Pages | 103895 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Psychologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103895 |
| PMID | 36958201 |
| OpenAlex | W4353106353 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 48 |
Despite evidence often showing differences between groups with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and neurotypical controls in moral judgment, the precise nature of these differences has been difficult to establish. At least two reasons for this are (1) that ASD (and its associated characteristics) is difficult to define and (2) that morality, and the inclinations that undergird it, are hard to measure empirically. These challenges have made conclusive associations between ASD and particular patterns of moral judgment hard to come by. Thus, in the current study, participants levels of a traits associated with ASD were assessed by their responses to a questionnaire (i.e., the Iowa Screener) before they made moral judgments across a set of 20 moral dilemmas that independently assess utilitarian and deontological processing. Interestingly, results indicated that increased levels of autistic traits were associated with fewer moral judgments corresponding to either moral theory; that is, higher levels of autistic traits were associated with atypical patterns of moral judgment. In addition, and consistent with some prior methods (e.g., Gaeth et al., 2016), participant scores on the Iowa Screener, as well as their self-identification, were used to categorize participants between two groups (i.e., ASD and Typical) for exploratory purposes. Taken together, this research better informs the relationship between ASD and its associated traits with moral judgment and can inform certain discrepant findings in the field. Implications and ideas for future research are discussed, such as whether traits associated with ASD might relate to alternative moral inclinations, beyond deontology and utilitarianism
Autism · Autism spectrum disorder · Autistic traits · Developmental psychology · Moral development · Morality · Neurotypical · Set (abstract data type) · Autism Spectrum Disorder Research · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Assessing the Knobe Effect in Autistic and Non-Autistic Individuals
Does blame always shift? Examining the impact of workplace safety communication language on post-accident blame attributions for multiple entities
Thinking differently
Dual process in moral decision making in autistic adults without intellectual disability
The Trolley Problem
Beyond sacrificial harm
Moral Heuristics
Pushing moral buttons
A process dissociation framework
The emotional dog and its rational tail
An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making
Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |