Probability overestimation induced by icon arrays

In decision making under risk, where the consequences of choices vary depending on specific probabilities, a proper interpretation of the presented probabilities is essential. However, because people are not good at evaluating numerical values, such as percentages, efforts have been made to accurately convey presented probabilities using visual aids represented by icon arrays. However, previous studies have suggested that icon arrays produce an overestimation of probabilities under specific conditions. Especially, (a) the arrangement of highlighted icons and (b) the severity of the outcomes represented by highlighted icons can lead to an overestimation of probabilities. By considering the absolute estimation of probabilities indicated by icon arrays and manipulating the aforementioned factors, this study investigated whether these factors could elicit an overestimation of probabilities in an additive manner or whether they have interactive effects. Two studies (total N = 1171) consistently showed that the arrangement of highlighted icons and the outcome severity they indicate induced a perceptual bias in the estimation of the probabilities presented in icon arrays in an additive manner. When the highlighted icons were random and the outcomes they indicate were severe, the probabilities presented by the icon arrays were overestimated. Accordingly, the study not only confirms the robustness of the findings of previous studies but also expand our understanding of the probability overestimation caused by icon arrays. Here, we discuss our findings in terms of the impact of risk-related communication

Icon · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Computer Science · Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Psychology

• Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test

  Open Access•Angela Fagerlin, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher et al.•Medical Decision Making•2007

  Incluir item

• Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication

  J S Ancker, Y Senathirajah et al.•Journal of the American Medical…•2006

  Incluir item

• Measuring Risk Literacy

  Open Access•Edward T Cokely, M Galesic et al.•Judgment and Decision Making•2012

  Incluir item

• General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples

  Open Access•Isaac M Lipkus, Isaac Lipkus et al.•Medical Decision Making•2001

  Incluir item

• G*Power 3

  Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  Incluir item

• “A 30% Chance of Rain Tomorrow”

  Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Ralph Hertwig et al.•Risk Analysis•2005

  Incluir item

• Choices, values, and frames

  Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•American Psychologist•1984

  Incluir item

• What shapes the probability weighting function? Influence of affect, numeric competencies, and information formats

  Open Access•Darya Petrova, Jakub Traczyk et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2018

  Incluir item

• Effects of graphical presentation of benefits on cognitive judgments induced by affect heuristic

  Open Access•Kazuhisa Nagaya, Hiroyuki Shimizu•Appetite•2023

  Incluir item

• Who proficts from visual aids

  Open Access•Rocio Garcia-Retamero, M Galesic•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  Incluir item