Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A comparative study of athlete interference suppression in open- and closed-task conditions

Evidence from fNirs

Bibliographic Data

ID21284064
AuthorsMeiHua Su (0000-0002-1338-8038, Jimei University), Wenlong Ding (0009-0003-3948-7979, Jimei University), Shihui Yang (0009-0008-7690-3798, Jimei University), Xiangjing Ren (0009-0003-1287-7707, Jimei University)
Year2026
Volume268
Pages107386
Publication date2026-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueActa Psychologica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107386
PMID42398151
OpenAlexW7167243163
LanguageEN
References cited26

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the behavioral differences in interference inhibition capacity between athletes of open-skill and closed-skill sports, as well as the underlying neural mechanisms, and to elucidate the specific modulatory effects of different sport modalities on interference inhibition function. METHODS: Sixteen elite boxers and 16 elite triple jumpers were recruited as research participants. The Stroop color-word interference paradigm was employed in conjunction with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to record participants' response time, accuracy rate, and changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) concentration in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during congruent and incongruent task conditions. RESULTS: At the behavioral level, triple jump athletes demonstrated shorter reaction times, higher accuracy, and greater task stability across both task types, with comparable interference suppression efficiency between groups. At the neurological level, boxing athletes exhibited stronger activation in the OFC and VLPFC during the consistent task, reflecting "potential conflict preventive monitoring." During the inconsistent task, triple jump athletes showed significantly higher activation in the DLPFC (Ch10 channel p < 0.01, Ch8 channel p < 0.05), while boxing athletes demonstrated more prominent activation only in the left VLPFC (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Open-skill and closed-skill sports respectively shape distinct profiles of interference inhibition performance and underlying neural mechanisms. Behaviourally, closed-skill athletes demonstrate superior interference inhibition capacity relative to open-skill athletes. Neurologically, open-skill sports foster a neural adaptation strategy characterized by "broad-spectrum monitoring - rapid response", whereas closed-skill sports give rise to a cognitive pattern featured by "precise inhibition - efficient resource allocation"

Interference (communication) · Microneurography · Poison control · Sport Psychology and Performance · Sports Performance and Training · Traumatic Brain Injury Research

  • Half a century of research on the Stroop effect

    Colin M Macleod•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Virtual reality boxing

    Open Access•Annabelle Limballe, Richard Kulpa et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae