Conspiracy beliefs and the preference for natural treatments in medical decision-making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21284483 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lorenzo Gagliardi (0000-0001-9196-1576, University of Padua, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 259 |
| Pages | 105343 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Psychologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105343 |
| PMID | 40738066 |
| OpenAlex | W4412724100 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 83 |
Naturalness bias-the tendency to prefer natural products over synthetic alternatives-is a widespread phenomenon in consumer and health decision-making. Despite the lack of a clear scientific definition, the label "natural" evokes strong intuitive associations with purity, safety, and moral value. Interestingly, these associations often overlap with conspiratorial thinking, particularly in contexts where synthetic medical treatments are portrayed as harmful or profit-driven. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review on the relationship between naturalness bias and conspiracy beliefs. We included both empirical and theoretical sources across psychology, medicine, and health communication. Based on this review, we propose two complementary theoretical explanations for the causal link between the two phenomena, which go both directions: a consequential account, where conspiracy beliefs foster distrust in institutional medicine and encourage natural preferences; and a justificatory account, where intuitive preferences for natural options are rationalized by the means of conspiratorial narratives. In addition, we identify common psychological antecedents-such as Manichean worldviews, perceived lack of control, and intuitive cognitive styles-that may help explain the co-occurrence of these two tendencies. These insights offer new perspectives on the role of conspiracy beliefs in shaping health behaviors and medical decision-making.
Cognitive psychology · Group decision-making · Medical decision making · Medical emergency · Natural (archaeology) · Preference · Statistics · History · Mathematics · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Thinking and Deciding
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communication
Suspicion of institutions
When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the Covid‐19 pandemic
Conspiracy Beliefs About Birth Control
Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies
Going against the Herd
The Meaning of “Natural”
Media’s portrayal of CAM
Medical conspiracy theories
The Pitfalls of Epistemic Autonomy without Intellectual Humility
Do Conspiracy Theories Shape or Rationalize Vaccination Hesitancy Over Time
Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of “naturalness”
What is so special about conspiracy theories? Conceptually distinguishing beliefs in conspiracy theories from conspiracy beliefs in psychological research
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Someone is pulling the strings
Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures
Why conspiracy theories matter
Should we be concerned about herbal remedies
Expert relevance and the use of context-driven heuristic processes in risk perception
The Emergence of Conspirituality
Blinded by the Lies? Toward an Integrated Definition of Conspiracy Theories
Natural cycles” in lay understandings of climate change
Biased perception about gene technology
Tampering with nature
Does lack of control lead to conspiracy beliefs? A meta‐analysis
When views about alternative medicine, nature and god come in the way of people's vaccination intentions
The dark side of meaning-making
Naturalness as an ethical stance
Who Is Skeptical About Scientific Innovation? Examining Worldview Predictors of Artificial Intelligence, Nanotechnology, and Human Gene Editing Attitudes
Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning
Suspicion in the workplace
The social consequences of conspiracism
How 'alternative' is CAM? Rethinking conventional dichotomies between biomedicine and complementary/alternative medicine
Measuring the impact of Covid-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA
Everything has a limit
Imperialist Nostalgia
Conspiracy theories as stigmatized knowledge
Consumers Prefer 'Natural' More for Preventatives Than for Curatives
| Highly cited | No |
|---|