Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

J. S. Beck’s Theory of the Original Representing as an Interpretation of Kant

Bibliographic Data

ID21291685
AuthorsLuigi Filieri (0009-0007-0934-9195, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Kant-Forschungsstelle am Philosophischen Seminar 55128 Mainz Deutschland, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume103
Issue3
Pages501-530
Publication date2021-09-08
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-9101 • E-ISSN: 0943-3988
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/agph-2018-0022
OpenAlexW3098498448
LanguageEN
References cited22

This paper explores Beck’s theory of original representing in order to discuss both its historical and theoretical relevance and its implications concerning Kant’s views on the capacity to judge. My first concern will be to highlight the main points of Beck’s Kant interpretation and to show at which points he misunderstands Kant. My analysis also contains a positive aspect, for I adopt Beck’s claim that there is only one possible standpoint from which critical philosophy ought to be judged. Unlike Beck, I shall argue that this standpoint is that of Judgment’s normativity. I will consider the normative structure of Judgment from three perspectives: the proto-synthetic import of sensibility; the normative character of the pure concepts of the understanding; the lawfulness of the principles of the understanding. My basic idea is that only a normative account of Judgment can prove how and why all experience depends on the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments. On Kant’s account, the capacity to judge applies transcendental rules to establish the laws which make our experience and knowledge both possible and legitimate. Every single object is an object of experience only insofar as it conforms to the normative structure of Judgment. For Kant, to constitute an object means to apply the rules which make something possible as an object of experience and cognition

Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Normative · Object (grammar) · Political science · Relevance (law) · Sensibility · Transcendental number · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Kant and the Exact Sciences

    Michael Friedman•Kant and the Exact Sciences•1998

  • Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality

    Open Access•Emma Watkins, Eric Watkins•Kant and the Metaphysics of…•2004

  • Kant and the Claims of Knowledge

    Open Access•Paul Guyer•Kant and the Claims of Knowledge•1987

  • XXXI. Die Rostocker Kanthandschriften.

    Wilhelm Dilthey•Archiv für Geschichte der…•1889

  • The Development of Kantian Thought

    Bella K Milmed, Herman-J Def Vleeschauwer et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•1964

  • The logical structure of time according to the chapter on the Schematism

    Mario Caimi•Kant-Studien•2012

  • Das Anfangsproblem bei Karl Leonhard Reinhold

    Martin Bondeli•Das Anfangsproblem bei Karl…•1995

  • Blinde Anschauung

    Stefanie Grüne, Stefanie Grne•Philosophische Abhandlungen :…•2009

  • Kant and the Capacity to Judge

    Béatrice Longuenesse, Charles T Wolfe•Kant and the Capacity to Judge•1998

  • Kant's Theory of Normativity

    Open Access•Konstantin Pollok•Kant's Theory of Normativity•2017

  • Manifest Reality

    Lucy Allais•Manifest Reality•2015

  • Kant and the Normativity of Logic

    Open Access•Huaping Lu‐adler•European Journal of Philosophy•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae