Momentary versus Retrospective Sexual Consent Perceptions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21292410 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Malachi Willis (0000-0002-3173-3990, University of Glasgow, corresponding author), Kristen N Jozkowski (0000-0003-3894-5395, Indiana University Bloomington) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 811-819 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archives of Sexual Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-0002 • E-ISSN: 1573-2800 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10508-021-02182-7 |
| PMID | 34853977 |
| OpenAlex | W3214842837 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 21 |
Perceiving potential indicators of a person’s willingness is an integral component of sexual consent. Preliminary qualitative evidence using vignettes suggested that consent perceptions can change over the course of a sexual scenario. In the present study, we extended previous research by directly comparing momentary and retrospective sexual consent perceptions using a quantitative study design. Employing a staggered vignette protocol, we examined participants’ ( n = 962; 72.0% female) momentary perceptions of fictional characters’ sexual consent and compared them with participants’ retrospective perceptions of the characters’ consent. We hypothesized that participants would demonstrate a hindsight bias in that they would retrospectively indicate they thought the fictional characters were first willing to engage in sexual behavior earlier than when they did momentarily. We found that differences in participants’ momentary versus retrospective perceptions of characters’ sexual consent varied by the type of behavior. As we expected, participants demonstrated a hindsight bias for making out. Contrary to our hypothesis, participants were hesitant to retrospectively report that the characters were willing to engage in the other sexual behaviors (e.g., oral, vaginal, anal sex) at a point earlier than their momentary perceptions. That momentary and retrospective sexual consent perceptions significantly differ corroborates previous recommendations that sexual consent be conceptualized as an ongoing process
Alternative medicine · Developmental psychology · Hindsight bias · Informed consent · Perception · Retrospective cohort study · Vignette · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology · Surgery
Hindsight Bias
Sexual Consent Perceptions of a Fictional Vignette
Retrospective and Concurrent Self-Reports
Explicit Verbal Sexual Consent Communication
Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners
The Complexities of Sexual Consent Among College Students
Beyond the Dyad
She Left the Party
Sexual Consent In and Out of the Bedroom
Assessing the Within-Person Variability of Internal and External Sexual Consent
Perceptions of Sexual Consent
By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”
Consenting to Sexual Activity
Sexual Precedent’s Effect on Sexual Consent Communication
Hindsight
Making Sense of Sexual Consent
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |