Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fit-related Reasons to Inquire

Bibliographic Data

ID21293658
AuthorsGenae Matthews (0009-0006-0091-0233, University of North Carolina, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume104
Issue1
Pages244-259
Publication date2026-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00048402.2025.2505617
OpenAlexW4410601651
LanguageEN
References cited29

Recent philosophical work on inquiry yields important results about when it is appropriate to inquire and to what extent norms on inquiry are compatible with other epistemic norms. However, philosophers have been remarkably silent on the matter of what questions we ought to take up in the first place. In this paper, I take up this question, and argue that moral considerations constitute fit-related, right-kind reasons to adopt interrogative attitudes towards, and so inquire about, particular questions. This is a conclusion of more general interest, because—as I explain—we might think that moral considerations are at best wrong-kind reasons for attitudes. If my contentions are right, then there is at least one kind of attitude—namely interrogative attitudes—of which this is not true

Epistemology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • IX—Moral Encroachment

    Open Access•Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•2018

  • What we epistemically owe to each other

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Studies•2019

  • Epistemic Partiality in Friendship

    Sarah Stroud•Ethics•2006

  • Fittingness First

    Conor Mchugh, Jonathan Way•Ethics•2016

  • Five Types of Ethical Theory

    Charlie Dunbar Broad•Five Types of Ethical Theory•2014

  • Group Knowledge, Questions, and the Division of Epistemic Labour

    Open Access•Joshua Habgood-Coote•Ergo an Open Access Journal of…•2019

  • The Cognitive Demands of Friendship

    Open Access•Anna Brinkerhoff•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

  • Bearing Witness

    Open Access•Brookes Brown•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

  • Group Inquiry

    Open Access•Joshua Habgood-Coote•Erkenntnis•2022

  • The fundamental reason for reasons fundamentalism

    Open Access•Mark Schroeder•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Inquiring Minds Want to Improve

    ARIANNA FALBO•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • The rational impermissibility of accepting (some) racial generalizations

    Open Access•Renée Jorgensen Bolinger•Synthese•2020

  • The Epistemic and the Zetetic

    Jane Friedman•The Philosophical Review•2020

  • Freedom and Resentment, and Other Essays

    Open Access•Michael Durrant•Philosophical Books•1975

  • Against Beneficence

    Kyla Ebels‐duggan•Ethics•2008

  • The Normative and the Evaluative

    Richard Rowland, Rach Cosker-Rowland•Normative and the Evaluative•2019

  • The right and the wrong kind of reasons

    Open Access•Jan Gertken, Benjamin Kiesewetter•Philosophy Compass•2017

  • One Kind of Asking

    Dennis Whitcomb•The Philosophical Quarterly•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae