Hundert Jahre Formgeschichte
Ein Tribut an die Begründer
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21294751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans-Josef Klauck (0000-0003-4121-8906, Naomi Shenstone Donnelley Professor Emeritus of New Testament and Early Christian Literature, The University of Chicago Divinity School Swift Hall 306D, 1025 East 58th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 USA), Hans‐Josef Klauck (University of Chicago, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 49-84 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Biblische Zeitschrift (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0006-2014 • E-ISSN: 2589-0468 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.30965/25890468-06401003 |
| OpenAlex | W3004035357 |
| Language | EN |
A hundred years ago, in 1919–1922, the groundbreaking works on form-criticism appeared, mainly independent of each other. This means that it is time for a retrospect and an evaluation. The article starts with the forerunners, especially Johann Gottlieb Herder and Hermann Gunkel, but also some others. Then main paragraphs are devoted to each of the five protagonists: Martin Dibelius, Karl Ludwig Schmidt, Rudolph Bultmann, Martin Albertz and Georg Bertram. Their foundational form-critical studies are discussed and contextualized within their lives and their literary output. In the case of Dibelius, more attention than usual is given to the important differences between the first (1919) and the second edition (1933) of his “Formgeschichte” that was decisive for creating the terminology. The little known political options that Bertram favored are criticized. The final section draws some lines from the early 20th century to the present days
Art · Art history · Criticism · Humanities · Linguistics · Literature · Political science · Politics · Section (typography) · Terminology · Theology · Art, Aesthetics, and Perception · Classics · German Literature and Culture Studies · Historical Architecture and Urbanism · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|