Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Food safety perceptions and risk-mitigation strategies

Spillover effects of African swine fever on consumer meat choices in Vietnam

Bibliographic Data

ID21294844
AuthorsLuis Emilio Morales (0000-0001-6935-9634, UNE Business School, University of New England), Nam Hoang (0000-0003-2938-1209, UNE Business School, University of New England), Nam Huu Hoang (University of New England), Alison Colvin (University of New England), Xuan Ba Nguyen (Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry), Thi Nga Bui (0000-0001-9998-3227, Vietnam National University, Hanoi), Thi Kim Cuc Ngo (0000-0003-2451-4922, National Institute of Animal Science), Thi Le Quyen Ngo (National Institute of Animal Science), Huu Van Nguyen (0000-0001-8294-6067, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry)
Year2026
Volume128
Issue13
Pages413-430
Publication date2026-12-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-09-2025-1283
OpenAlexW7138461090
LanguageEN
References cited42

Purpose This study examines how animal disease outbreaks influence consumer behaviour beyond directly affected species. It investigates food safety perceptions and risk-mitigation strategies during the 2019 African Swine Fever outbreak, focusing on spillover effects on goat meat consumption in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey of 470 goat meat consumers in ten provinces of Vietnam was analysed using multinomial logistic regression to identify socio-demographic, perceptual and attitudinal drivers of risk-mitigation strategies. Findings While most consumers did not alter goat meat consumption, 17% changed their behaviour due to perceived spillover risks. Among them, 12.5% became more cautious, 4.2% reduced consumption and 1.5% increased it. Urban consumers were more likely to adopt cautious behaviours. Spending a larger share of income on food and viewing goat meat as convenient increased the likelihood of reducing consumption, while familiarity with goat meat and perceiving it as natural reduced this likelihood. Research limitations/implications There is a need for clear communication and trust-building to avoid unwarranted demand shifts across unrelated meats. Strengthening safety assurance, certification and consumer education is critical to sustaining confidence and market stability. Future studies could examine cross-country responses to assess spillover effects globally. Originality/value This is the first study linking food safety perceptions with risk-mitigation strategies and highlighting spillover effects of disease outbreaks on unrelated meats. It advances the understanding of consumer behaviour in crises and provides insights for policy and industry

Certification · Consumer behaviour · Consumption (sociology) · Food safety · Multinomial logistic regression · Ordered logit · Outbreak · Perception · Spillover effect · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Food Safety and Hygiene · Organic Food and Agriculture

  • Economic Choices

    Daniel Mcfadden•American Economic Review•2001

  • Discussing how to restore the corporate image after a food safety incident

    Chiao‐Chen Chang•British Food Journal•2025

  • Impact of reliable news information on consumers' perceptions and information seeking intentions from a food safety risk

    Open Access•Cheng-Xian Yang, Lauri M Baker•British Food Journal•2024

  • Food safety attitudes and government policy trust in the relationship between health literacy and consumer’s food consumption behaviours

    Yi-Hua Chang, Tzu-Chi Chao et al.•British Food Journal•2025

  • The Social Amplification of Risk

    Open Access•Roger E Kasperson, Ortwin Renn et al.•Risk Analysis•1988

  • From Meatless Mondays to Meatless Sundays

    Charlotte De Backer, Charlotte J S De Backer et al.•Ecology of Food and Nutrition•2014

  • Ethical Challenges for Livestock Production

    Open Access•Wim Verbeke, Wim A J Verbeke et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2000

  • Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare

    Open Access•Beth Clark, Gary Stewart et al.•Food Policy•2017

  • Changes in U.S. consumer response to food safety recalls in the shadow of a BSE scare

    Open Access•Mykel Taylor, Mykel R Taylor et al.•Food Policy•2016

  • Why some consumers don't care”

    Open Access•Jörg Rieger, Daniela Weible et al.•Appetite•2017

  • Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food

    Open Access•Andrew Steptoe, Tessa M Pollard et al.•Appetite•1995

  • Influence of food safety concerns on safe food purchasing at rural and urban consumers in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Rakia Ishra, Rasheda Khanam et al.•Appetite•2022

  • Consumer perceptions of food safety risk, control and responsibility

    Open Access•Elizabeth C Redmond, Christopher J Griffith et al.•Appetite•2004

  • A New Approach to Consumer Theory

    Kelvin Lancaster, Kelvin J Lancaster•Journal of Political Economy•1966

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae