Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Governance models based on subject participation and their effectiveness regarding anti-food waste in China

Bibliographic Data

ID21295548
AuthorsFangzhou Ran (0009-0000-5274-7630, China University of Mining and Technology), Feiyu Chen (0000-0002-9408-4393, China University of Mining and Technology), Guangyu Liu (0000-0001-7393-5497, China University of Mining and Technology), Shiyan Jiang (0000-0003-4781-846X, China University of Mining and Technology), Jing Hou (0000-0003-0792-8971, Jiangsu Normal University)
Year2026
Volume128
Issue2
Pages567-595
Publication date2026-01-23
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-04-2025-0520
OpenAlexW4415620469
LanguageEN
References cited92

Purpose This study aims to classify anti-food waste governance models based on participation from stakeholders, evaluate and predict the dynamic waste reduction effectiveness of different models, and select the optimal governance scheme to reduce food waste, contributing to the SDGs. Design/methodology/approach Based on 489 policy texts in China from 1955 to 2023, this study identifies governance subjects, classifies governance models, evaluates their effectiveness in curbing typical categories of food waste and further predicts the main amounts of food waste under different governance-model-oriented scenarios for 2024–2030 to identify the optimal scheme. Findings In model classification, the primary models are government-led, government-enterprise cooperation and social organization-facilitated. In effectiveness evaluation, these models significantly reduce waste of vegetables, milk, soybeans, fruits, nuts and eggs. Different models vary in effectiveness in restraining different types of food waste. Classification governance can be implemented in the future. Anti-food waste governance exhibits a lag, and the simple superposition of governance models cannot effectively inhibit food waste. In scenario prediction, the amount of food waste in China from 2024 to 2030 shows an overall upward trend and will not peak in the short term. However, the study combines the effectiveness of different models to identify the optimal governance scheme. Originality/value Classifying governance models based on participation enables precise identification of weak governance links and facilitates targeted incentives. Dynamic effectiveness evaluation and prediction provide an empirical basis for evidence-based policymaking

China · Corporate governance · Empirical research · Environmental governance · Food waste · Identification (biology) · Multi-level governance · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability · Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management · Municipal Solid Waste Management

  • Complex innovation policy systems

    Open Access•Edurne Magro, James R Wilson•Research Policy•2013

  • Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions

    Open Access•Annika Stechemesser, Nicolas Koch et al.•Science•2024

  • The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives

    Open Access•Sandra Moog, André Spicer et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2015

  • Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’

    Carey Doberstein•Public Management Review•2016

  • Food waste within food supply chains

    Open Access•Julian Parfitt, Mark Barthel et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2010

  • A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Ethical disputes, coordinating acts and NGO accountability

    Open Access•Soon Yong Ang, Danture Wickramasinghe•Critical Perspectives on Accounting•2023

  • How environmental policy synergy can enhance urban ecological resilience

    Open Access•Tao Ge, Zixuan Hao et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Green taxation, regional green development and innovation

    Open Access•Yi Yang, Tian Zheng et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Implementing collaborative governance

    Carmine Bianchi, Greta Nasi et al.•Public Management Review•2021

  • Navigating network governance

    Jo Barraket, Joanne Mcneill et al.•Public Management Review•2023

  • Local government as a catalyst for promoting social enterprise

    Donwe Choi, Jinsol Park•Public Management Review•2021

  • External or internal beauty? A study on the mechanism influencing food waste behavior

    Feiyu Chen, Shiyan Jiang et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2024

  • Transparency in global fisheries governance

    Open Access•Matilda Petersson, Matilda T Petersson•Marine Policy•2022

  • Educational policy as predictor of computational thinking

    Open Access•Ndudi Okechukwu Ezeamuzie, Jessica Shuk Ching Leung et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2024

  • What organizational conditions, in combination, drive technology enactment in government-led smart city projects

    Open Access•Rui Mu, Maidina Haershan et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Policy scenarios as an instrument for policymakers

    Open Access•David Wright, B C Stahl et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Machine learning and the optimization of prediction-based policies

    Open Access•Pietro Battiston, Simona Gamba et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • How the Soybean Producer Subsidy Policy affects crop planting structure

    Open Access•Siqi Zhang, Rong Cai et al.•British Food Journal•2025

  • Optimization of industrial layout in airport economic zone through government-enterprise interaction

    Open Access•Dan Wang, Xu Zhao et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Polycentricity of urban watershed governance

    Open Access•Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah, Nadine Shaanta Murshid•Urban Studies•2018

  • Absolute abundance and relative scarcity

    Open Access•Corrado Di Maria, Sjak Smulders et al.•Ecological Economics•2012

  • Governance tools for urban food system policy innovations in the Milano Urban Food Policy Pact

    Open Access•Daniel Polman, Giulia Bazzan•European Urban and Regional Studies•2023

  • Governance, complexity, and resilience

    Open Access•Andreas Duit, Victor Galaz et al.•Global Environmental Change•2010

  • Integrating food security into public health and provincial government departments in British Columbia, Canada

    Open Access•Barbara Seed, Tim Lang et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2013

  • Government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation in China's policymaking

    Open Access•Shuangshuang Qiu, Xiang Gao et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Do moral constraints and government interventions promote the willingness and behaviors of food saving among urban residents in China? An empirical study based on structural equation model

    Open Access•Duo Chai, Shujin Yu et al.•Food Policy•2024

  • A theory-based evaluation of food waste policy

    Open Access•Simone Busetti•Food Policy•2019

  • Grassroots waste picker organizations addressing the UN sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Jutta Gutberlet•World Development•2020

  • Stunting and selection effects of famine

    Open Access•Tue Gørgens, Xin Meng et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2011

  • Collaborative neighborhood governance and its effectiveness in community mitigation to Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Zhilin Liu, Sainan Lin et al.•Cities•2021

  • Reducing the plate waste of families at hotel buffets – A quasi-experimental field study

    Open Access•Sara Dolnicar, Emil Juvan et al.•Tourism Management•2020

  • Governance transformation among urbanization in China

    Open Access•Shurong Yao, Yujun Zhou et al.•Habitat International•2024

  • Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour

    Open Access•Violeta Stancu, Pernille Haugaard et al.•Appetite•2016

  • Environmental governance and the hybrid regime of Australian natural resource management

    Open Access•Michael Lockwood, Julie Davidson•Geoforum•2010

  • Urban food policy councils as politicized spaces

    Open Access•Amber Steyaert, Thomas W Kuyper et al.•Food Policy•2025

  • Political Constraints on Legal Doctrine

    Jeffrey R Lax•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Regulating government affairs

    Open Access•David Coen, Alexander Katsaitis et al.•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Topic Modeling and Text Analysis for Qualitative Policy Research

    Open Access•Karoliina Isoaho, Daria Gritsenko et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2021

  • Discursive Institutionalism

    Vivien A Schmidt•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Governing Ourselves

    Open Access•Georgina Blakeley•International Journal of Urban…•2010

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae