Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ensuring privacy through synthetic data generation in education

Bibliographic Data

ID21297231
AuthorsQinyi Liu (0000-0001-9953-5184, Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway, corresponding author), Ronas Shakya (0000-0002-7148-4028, Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway), Jelena Jovanović (0000-0001-6134-8180, Faculty of Organisational Sciences University of Belgrade, Serbia; Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology (SLATE), University of Bergen Bergen Norway), Mohammad Khalil (0000-0002-6860-4404, Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology University of Bergen Bergen Norway), Javier De la Hoz-Ruiz (0000-0001-7670-5662, Faculty of Education Sciences University of Granada Granada Spain)
Year2025
Volume56
Issue3
Pages1053-1073
Publication date2025-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjet.13576
OpenAlexW4407796819
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited25

High‐volume, high‐quality and diverse datasets are crucial for advancing research in the education field. However, such datasets often contain sensitive information that poses significant privacy challenges. Traditional anonymisation techniques fail to meet the privacy standards required by regulations like GDPR, prompting the need for more robust solutions. Synthetic data have emerged as a promising privacy‐preserving approach, allowing for the generation and sharing of datasets that mimic real data while ensuring privacy. Still, the application of synthetic data alone on educational datasets remains vulnerable to privacy threats such as linkage attacks. Therefore, this study explores for the first time the application of private synthetic data , which combines synthetic data with differential privacy mechanisms, in the education sector. By considering the dual needs of data utility and privacy, we investigate the performance of various synthetic data generation techniques in safeguarding sensitive educational information. Our research focuses on two key questions: the capability of these techniques to prevent privacy threats and their impact on the utility of synthetic educational datasets. Through this investigation, we aim to bridge the gap in understanding the balance between privacy and utility of advanced privacy‐preserving techniques within educational contexts. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Traditional privacy‐preserving methods for educational datasets have not proven successful in ensuring a balance of data utility and privacy. Additionally, these methods often lack empirical evaluation and/or evidence of successful application in practice. Synthetic data generation is a state‐of‐the‐art privacy‐preserving method that has been increasingly used as a substitute for real datasets for data publishing and sharing. However, recent research has demonstrated that even synthetic data are vulnerable to privacy threats. Differential privacy (DP) is the gold standard for quantifying and mitigating privacy concerns. Its combination with synthetic data, often referred to as private synthetic data, is presently the best available approach to ensuring data privacy. However, private synthetic data have not been studied in the educational domain. What this study contributes The study has applied synthetic data generation methods with DP mechanisms to educational data for the first time, provided a comprehensive report on the utility and privacy of the resulting synthetic data, and explored factors affecting the performance of synthetic data generators in the context of educational datasets. The experimental results of this study indicate that no synthetic data generator consistently outperforms others across all evaluation metrics in the examined educational datasets. Instead, different generators excel in their respective areas of proficiency, such as privacy or utility. Highlighting the potential of synthetic data generation techniques in the education sector, this work paves the way for future developments in the use of synthetic data generation for privacy‐preserving educational research. Implications for practice and/or policy Key takeaways for practical application include the importance of conducting case‐specific evaluations, carefully balancing data privacy with utility and exercising caution when using private synthetic data generators for high‐precision computational tasks, especially in resource‐limited settings as highlighted in this study. Educational researchers and practitioners can leverage synthetic data to release data without compromising student privacy, thereby promoting the development of open science and contributing to the advancement of education research. The robust privacy performance of DP‐synthetic data generators may help alleviate students' privacy concerns while fostering their trust in sharing personal information. By improving the transparency and security of data sharing, DP‐synthetic data generators technologies can promote student‐centred data governance practices while providing a strong technical foundation for developing responsible data usage policies.

Computer security · Internet privacy · Computer Science · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

  • AI for data generation in education

    Open Access•Mohammad Khalil, Qinyi Liu et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • Learning Analytics with Small Datasets—State of the Art and Beyond

    Open Access•Ngoc Buu Cat Nguyen, Thashmee Karunaratne•Education Sciences•2024

  • Understanding privacy and data protection issues in learning analytics using a systematic review

    Open Access•Qinyi Liu, Mohammad Khalil•British Journal of Educational…•2023

  • Controlled outputs, full data

    Open Access•Stephen Hutt, Ryan S Baker et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Technological frameworks on ethical and trustworthy learning analytics

    Open Access•Djazia Ladjal, Srecko Joksimovic et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2022

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae