Make‐believe play with the Internet of Toys
A case for multimodal playscapes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21297320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ioanna Palaiologou (0000-0003-0666-3959, Department of Psychology Canterbury Educational Services Nottingham UK, corresponding author), Sarika Kewalramani (0000-0002-4937-3364, Faculty of Education Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia), Μαρία Δαρδανού (0000-0003-3247-158X, Department of Teacher Education and Pedagogy UiT Norwegian Arctic University Tromsø Norway) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2100-2117 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjet.13110 |
| OpenAlex | W3161459206 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 19 |
This study examines whether the Internet of Toys (IoToys) (de)limits children's make‐believe play and whether the functionality and manipulatives offered by the IoToys serve as motivational pleasure (tactile, virtual and visual) for children to engage in make‐believe play. Combining Piagetian and Vygotskian ideas of play as a unity of cognition and social context, we consider IoToys as a motivational conduit for children's symbolic actions that leads to make‐believe play. Qualitative methodology was employed using observations of young children at home when interacting with IoToys (total n = 10 families) from England ( n = 5 families) and Australia ( n = 5 families). Data showed that children's interaction does not limit the development of their make‐believe play as they engage in imitation schemata and create imaginative situations within and beyond the intended pre‐programmed functions of the IoToy. To conclude, it is argued that instead of differentiating virtual and physical play, we should (re)think play with multimodal playscape lenses. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Children from a very young age engage with mainly touch screen technology and this engagement has led to the discourse of digital play inquiries. When children use technology, they create imaginary situations that leads to make‐believe play. What this paper adds Research on the haptic technologies is still in an embryonic stage. Thus, this paper aims to examine how children engage with this new developing technology in home‐based settings. The findings of our research suggest that when haptic technological tools are used by children, this leads to make‐believe play using physical and virtual spaces as a continuum of child's learning and development. Implications for practice and/or policy As children's interactions with haptic technologies showed that they exhibit motivated actions and psychologically triggered interactions, this calls for parent‐educator partnerships to foster a pedagogy that embeds a poly‐pronged approach (digital, virtual, visual, physical) which enhances children's multimodal playscapes.
Context (archaeology) · Imitation · Pleasure · The Imaginary · The Internet · Child Development and Digital Technology · Computer Science · Digital Storytelling and Education · Education and Technology Integration · Psychology · Social Psychology
Ethical considerations and dilemmas for the researcher and for families in home-based research
Young children's Internet of Toys play at home
Artificial intelligence education for young children
The influence of pretend 'technologies' on children's cognitive development in symbolic play
An ecological perspective on children's play with digital technologies in South Africa and the United Kingdom
Designing educational technologies in the age of AI
Imagination and Creativity in Childhood
Play, Cognitive Development, and the Social World
Development of Intersubjectivity in Social Pretend Play
The Internet of Toys
All Things Being Equal
Play and Its Role in the Mental Development of the Child
Makerspaces in early childhood education
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |