The Suffragette Movement and Civil Liberties
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21299716 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Conor Gearty (0000-0002-3885-2650, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 602-629 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Cambridge Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-1973 • E-ISSN: 1469-2139 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008197325101001 |
| OpenAlex | W4417314816 |
| Language | EN |
The extent to which the English common law protected civil liberties in the past is widely debated. Were the judges protectors of core freedoms such as liberty and the right to protest or were they allies of the executive in their hostility towards them? Since at least Dicey, the common law has had a vision of itself as the former, but what does practice reveal? This article explores the many ways in which the advocates of female suffrage in the 10 years or so before the First World War interacted with executive and judicial authority in their effort to use what they saw as their ancient freedoms to protect their campaigning for the vote for women. The suffragette campaign generated a series of conflicts between the judicial and executive branches of the state while also testing the depth of the common law’s commitment to civil liberties
Civil liberties · Civil rights · Common law · Movement (music) · Spanish Civil War · State (computer science) · Suffrage · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Legal Studies and Society
| Highly cited | No |
|---|