Fiduciaries Then and Now
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21299733 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Worthington (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | S1 |
| Pages | S154-S178 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Cambridge Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-1973 • E-ISSN: 1469-2139 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008197321000611 |
| OpenAlex | W3203956304 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
This article takes as its starting point three ground-breaking articles by Len Sealy in the 1960s, and examines their lasting impact on the modern law of fiduciaries. It includes a detailed consideration of the modern tendency to describe rather than define fiduciaries; it critiques the current readiness to merge fiduciaries with other power-holders, thus ignoring the significant differences between the duties of loyalty in issue in the two contexts; and finally it evaluates and defends the modern approach to fiduciary remedies, especially equitable compensation
Duty · Duty of loyalty · Economics · Fiduciary · Law and economics · Merge (version control) · Political science · Computer Science · Law · Legal principles and applications · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |