Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

In Defence of Classical Administrative Law

Bibliographic Data

ID21299770
AuthorsMark Elliott (0000-0003-4402-6600, University of Cambridge, corresponding author), Philip Murray (Robinson College)
Year2025
Pages1-34
Publication date2025-12-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Cambridge Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-1973 • E-ISSN: 1469-2139
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0008197325101062
OpenAlexW4417360328
LanguageEN

The classical account of administrative law, which holds that unlawful administrative acts are void ab initio and that judicial review remedies such as quashing orders are merely declaratory of such acts’ legal status, appears to be placed in doubt by a range of recent legislative developments, judicial pronouncements and academic commentary. However, the classical account is not only capable of withstanding those apparent challenges: it is constitutionally imperative if collateral challenge is to be maintained and the rule of law thereby upheld

Administrative law · Collateral · Duty · Judicial review · Legislature · Standard of review · Energy Law and Policy · Legal Issues in South Africa · Ombudsman and Human Rights

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae