Finding the British Google
Relaxing the Prohibition of Dual-Class Stock From the Premium-Tier of the London Stock Exchange
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21299803 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bobby V Reddy (0000-0002-6519-3160, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 315-348 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Cambridge Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-1973 • E-ISSN: 1469-2139 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008197320000379 |
| OpenAlex | W3124247846 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 38 |
There is a dearth of British tech-companies listing on the London Stock Exchange (LSE), and the LSE lacks a large, innovative tech-company such as Google. The UK Government, concerned as to the loss of UK tech-companies to foreign acquirors, views the encouragement of UK tech-firm listings as a policy priority. Dual-class stock, currently prohibited from the LSE Main Market's premium-tier, allows founders to list their firms, and retain majority-control, while holding significantly less of the cash-flow rights in the company. This article will broach the potential for dual-class stock to attract UK tech-company listings, and explore the benefits that dual-class stock can engender for UK tech-companies and their public shareholders. The risks of dual-class structures will also be discussed, but it will be shown that in a UK regulatory context, in relation to high-growth tech-companies, the risks may not be as severe as presumed, and easily moderated through judicious controls
Business · Context (archaeology) · Corporate governance · Listing (finance) · Shareholder · Stock (firearms) · Stock exchange · Stock market · Corporate Finance and Governance · Corporate Governance and Law · Corporate Insolvency and Governance · Engineering · Finance
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |