Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The effect of gaze contingencies on infants' looking preference

Bibliographic Data

ID21306194
AuthorsTal Ravid-Roth (University of Haifa), Romi Livne (Tel Aviv University), Ariel Berlinger (University of Haifa), Wilfried Kunde (0000-0001-6256-8011), Kunde Wilfried (University of Würzburg), Baruch Eitam (0000-0002-2202-3073, University of Haifa), Sagi Jaffe-Dax, Jaffe-Dax Sagi (Tel Aviv University)
Year2026
Volume270
Pages106417
Publication date2026-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognition (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-0277 • E-ISSN: 1873-7838
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106417
PMID41429099
OpenAlexW7116631103
LanguageEN
References cited62

Infants exhibit robust predictive capacities from birth; Most research has focused on how they process externally generated events, leaving unexplored how predictions rooted in their own actions influence attention. We asked whether the source of predictability- self-generated vs. externally structured- affects infants' looking preferences beyond overall predictability. Across two gaze-contingent eye-tracking experiments, we investigated whether infants prefer to look at stimuli whose movements are triggered by their own gaze, or at stimuli that move independently. In Experiment 1 (n = 21, M = 10.11 months), we compared a stimulus whose movement was fully gaze-contingent with a stimulus whose movement pattern was identical to the target, but with a randomly timed onset. In Experiment 2 (n = 22, M = 8.24 months), we presented a gaze-contingent stimulus alongside a moderately predictable but uncontrollable alternative, directly comparing self-generated versus externally structured predictability. In both experiments, infants consistently preferred the gaze-contingent target. This preference was especially pronounced in younger infants and diminished with age. Pupil size analyses supported this interpretation. In Experiment 1, contingent stimuli elicited lower arousal, which is consistent with learned predictability. In contrast, in Experiment 2, pupil responses were similarly low for both stimuli, indicating that their predictability was indeed matched and that contingency itself drove the preference. Overall, these findings suggest that infants are not only attuned to the structure of their environment, but to their own causal influence within it. The results are congruent with the Reinforcement from Sensorimotor Predictability (RSP) framework, which posits that predictable outcomes of self-initiated actions are intrinsically rewarding. Thus, from the earliest months of life, infants appear not only to seek stimulation, but also evidence of their own effectiveness

Contingency · Eye movement · Gaze · Predictability · Preference · Reinforcement · Stimulus (psychology) · Action Observation and Synchronization · Child and Animal Learning Development · Face Recognition and Perception

  • Of Human Bonding

    Open Access•Anthony J DeCasper, William P Fifer•Science•1980

  • Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data

    Open Access•Eric Maris, Robert Oostenveld•Journal of Neuroscience Methods•2007

  • An Internal Model for Sensorimotor Integration

    Open Access•Daniel M Wolpert, Zoubin Ghahramani et al.•Science•1995

  • Predictive coding

    Open Access•James M Kilner, Karl J Friston et al.•Cognitive Processing•2007

  • Why canʼt you tickle yourself?

    Sarah‐jayne Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore et al.•NeuroReport•2000

  • The Goldilocks Effect

    Open Access•Celeste Kidd, Steven T Piantadosi et al.•PLoS ONE•2012

  • Default Bayes factors for Anova designs

    Open Access•Jeffrey N Rouder, Roy D Morey et al.•Journal of Mathematical Psychology•2012

  • The free-energy principle

    Open Access•Karl J Friston, Karl Friston•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2010

  • Making Sense of the World

    Open Access•Moritz Köster, Ezgi Kayhan et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2020

  • The contribution of temporal analysis of pupillometry measurements to cognitive research

    Open Access•Ronen Hershman, Dalit Milshtein et al.•Psychological Research•2023

  • Curious Choices

    Open Access•Elena C Altmann, Marina Bazhydai et al.•Cognition•2025

  • The self as phenotype

    Open Access•Philippe Rochat•Consciousness and Cognition•2011

  • Infant visual recognition memory

    Open Access•Susan A Rose, Judith F Feldman et al.•Developmental Review•2004

  • Do infants have agency? – The importance of control for the study of early agency

    Open Access•Florian Markus Bednarski, Kristina Musholt et al.•Developmental Review•2022

  • Development of infants' segmentation of words from native speech

    Open Access•Christina Bergmann, Alejandrina Cristia•Developmental Science•2015

  • Online measures of looking and learning in infancy

    Open Access•Alexis S Smith-Flores, Jasmin Perez et al.•Infancy•2022

  • Infant Cortical Development and the Prospective Control of Saccadic Eye Movements

    Open Access•Richard L Canfield, Natasha Z Kirkham•Infancy•2001

  • Do Human Fetuses Anticipate Self‐Oriented Actions? A Study by Four‐Dimensional (4D) Ultrasonography

    Open Access•Masako Myowa‐Yamakoshi, Hideko Takeshita•Infancy•2006

  • Automated gaze-contingent objects elicit orientation following in 8-month-old infants

    Fani Deligianni, Atsushi Senju et al.•Developmental Psychology•2011

  • Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory

    Susan A Rose, Allen W Gottfried et al.•Developmental Psychology•1982

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae